Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30637457›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2019

Body regional heat pain thresholds using the method of limit and level: a comparative study.

Sungjin Park, Sang-Hyun Roh, Joo-Young Lee

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sungjin ParkCOMFORT Laboratory, College of Human Ecology, Seoul National University, Bld #222-#room 306, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 08826, South Korea.
Sang-Hyun RohCOMFORT Laboratory, College of Human Ecology, Seoul National University, Bld #222-#room 306, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 08826, South Korea.
Joo-Young LeeCOMFORT Laboratory, College of Human Ecology, Seoul National University, Bld #222-#room 306, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 08826, South Korea. leex3140@snu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5208-0941

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea No. 2016M3A7B4910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to compare cutaneous heat pain thresholds using the method of limit and level.

methodsSixteen young males (23.2 ± 3.2 year, 174.9 ± 4.9 cm, and 70.1 ± 8.6 kg) participated in this study. The thermode temperature increased at a constant rate of 0.1 °C s

resultsThe results are as follows. Heat pain thresholds were on average 3.2 ± 2.1 °C higher for the method of level than for the method of limit (P < 0.05). Second, the correlation coefficient between values by two methods was 0.819 (P < 0.01). Third, lower body regions (thigh, calf, and sole) had higher heat pain thresholds than upper body regions (chest) by the method of level only (P < 0.05). Fourth, body regional subcutaneous fat thickness showed no relationship with heat pain thresholds except the upper arm.

conclusionThese results indicated that cutaneous heat pain thresholds vary based on the type of heat stimuli and body regions. The method of limit could be applied for predicting accumulated thermal pain starting from moderate heat, whereas the method of level may be applicable for predicting acute heat pain to flames or high heat.

Indexed as

Hot TemperatureSkin Physiological PhenomenaAdultFootHandHumansMaleMusculoskeletal PainPain MeasurementPain ThresholdSkinBody regional differenceBurnHeat pain thresholdsMethod of levelMethod of limitSubcutaneous fat thickness

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.