Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30637411›Full record

ArticleExperimental IR meets multilinguality, multimodality, and interaction : 8th International Conference of the CLEF Association, CLEF 2017, Dublin, Ireland, September 11-14, 2017, Proceedings. Cross-Language Evaluation Forum. Conference2017

Segmenting Compound Biomedical Figures into Their Constituent Panels.

Pengyuan Li, Xiangying Jiang, Chandra Kambhamettu, Hagit Shatkay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental IR meets multilinguality, multimodality, and interaction : 8th International Conference of the CLEF Association, CLEF 2017, Dublin, Ireland, September 11-14, 2017, Proceedings. Cross-Language Evaluation Forum. Conference, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pengyuan LiDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Xiangying JiangDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Chandra KambhamettuDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Hagit ShatkayDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.

Funding

Utilizing Imaged-based Features in Biomedical Literature ClassificationR56LM011354 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI SHATKAY, HAGIT · 2014 to 2015
$560k
NLM NIH HHS R56 LM011354
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many of the figures in biomedical publications are compound figures consisting of multiple panels. Segmenting such figures into constituent panels is an essential first step for harvesting the visual information within the biomedical documents. Current figure separation methods are based primarily on gap-detection and suffer from over- and under-segmentation. In this paper, we propose a new compound figure segmentation scheme based on Connected Component Analysis. To overcome shortcomings typically manifested by existing methods, we develop a quality assessment step for evaluating and modifying segmentations. Two methods are proposed to re-segment the images if the initial segmentations are inaccurate. Experiments and results comparing the performance of our method to that of other top methods demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.

Indexed as

Biomedical imageCompound image separationConnected component analysis

Identifiers

PMID30637411
PMCPMC6329596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.