Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30637091›Full record

ArticleSocial psychological and personality science2019

The vicarious effects of discrimination: How partner experiences of discrimination affect individual health.

Nyla Wofford, Andrew M Defever, William J Chopik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychological and personality science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. "I Could Feel His Sadness and Disdain as He Told Me": A Qualitative Analysis of Black Women's Accounts of Vicarious Racism.Sociological perspectives : SP : official publication of the Pacific Sociological Association · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Double Impact: A Dyadic Discrimination Model for Poor, Minority, and Pregnant Couples.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nyla WoffordPrairie View A&M University.
Andrew M DefeverMichigan State University.
William J ChopikMichigan State University.

Funding

HRS Yrs29-34: Y33 SSA CoFundingU01AG009740 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Jessica Faul, KENNETH M LANGA · 1990 to 2026
$555.8M
The Dyadic Effects of Optimism on Health and Biological Functioning: An Investigation of Health Behavior MechanismsR03AG054705 · NIA · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CHOPIK, WILLIAM JOSEPH · 2017 to 2018
$155k
NIA NIH HHS R03 AG054705NIA NIH HHS U01 AG009740
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about how discriminatory experiences are associated with interpersonal relationships-specifically whether one person's experience of discrimination has psychological effects on their partner and their relationship (i.e., vicarious effects). Using dyadic data analyses, we examined actor and partner effects of discriminatory experiences on self-rated health, chronic illness, depression, and relationship strain in a sample of 1,949 couples (3,898 participants). Actor and partner discrimination were associated with poorer health, greater depression, and greater relationship strain. These effects were mediated by higher levels of relationship strain. Our findings provide insight into the effects of direct and vicarious experiences of discrimination on interpersonal relationships.

Indexed as

depressiondiscriminationinterpersonal relationshipsphysical health

Identifiers

PMID30637091
PMCPMC6326585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.