Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30637027›Full record

ArticlePharmacy practice

Health promotion of bowel cancer and breast cancer screening in community pharmacies: Pharmacists' perceptions of their role, knowledge and confidence.

Marguerite C Sendall, Liz Ostermann, Carolyn Brown, Laura Mccosker

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Co-Design of an Evidence-Based Health Education Strategy to Improve Bowel Cancer Awareness and Screening in a Remote Tasmanian Community: Lessons Learned.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Community pharmacists' role in prevention of breast cancer - is it possible?Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marguerite C SendallSchool of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology. Brisbane, QLD (Australia). m.sendall@qut.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-1239-9173
Liz OstermannCancer Screening Unit, Preventive Health Branch, Department of Health, Queensland Government. Brisbane, QLD (Australia). Liz.Ostermann@health.qld.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6033-7826
Carolyn BrownBreastScreen Queensland, Metro South Health, Queensland Government. Brisbane, QLD (Australia). Carolyn.Brown2@health.qld.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0003-4217-9830
Laura MccoskerSchool of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology. Brisbane, QLD (Australia). lk.mccosker@qut.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-9107-9401
Queensland Government · AUQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify community pharmacists' perceptions of their role, knowledge and confidence in relation to bowel cancer and breast cancer screening health promotion.

methodsThis was a mixed-methods study with community pharmacists and key informants in the Metro South Health (MSH) region of Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. In Part 1, quantitative data was collected from community pharmacists via an electronic survey. In Part 2, qualitative data was collected from community pharmacists and key informants via in-depth interviews. This paper reports the findings of community pharmacists' perceptions of their role, knowledge and confidence to promote bowel cancer and breast cancer screening in community pharmacies.

resultsA total of 27 community pharmacists (13 males, 14 females) completed the survey. Most (71%) either 'agreed' or 'strongly agreed' discussing health advice, such as cancer screening, with their consumers was valuable and integral to their broader role. An average of 60% described their confidence as 'average' or 'good' when discussing bowel and breast cancer screening and prevention with consumers. In eight knowledge questions about bowel and breast cancer and cancer screening, an average of 82% of community pharmacists responded with correct answers (range 52% to 100%). Community pharmacists were consistently more confident and knowledgeable about bowel cancer services than breast cancer services. Five (5) community pharmacists participated in in-depth interviews. The interview findings supported the quantitative findings. Most community pharmacists described their confidence to promote bowel cancer and breast cancer screening as moderate, and consistently reflected they felt more knowledgeable and confident about bowel cancer topics than breast cancer topics.

conclusionsOverall, this research supports the feasibility of promoting bowel cancer screening in community pharmacies. It suggests further training is warranted for community pharmacists to increase their knowledge of breast cancer and their confidence in promoting breast cancer referral and screening services. It highlights the important role community pharmacists have in increasing engagement in the national bowel cancer and breast cancer screening programs, and in potentially decreasing the mortality rates of these cancers.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAttitudesAustraliaBreast NeoplasmsCommunity Pharmacy ServicesEarly Detection of CancerHealth KnowledgeHealth PromotionIntestinal NeoplasmsMass ScreeningPharmaciesPharmacistsPracticeQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID30637027
PMCPMC6322987
OpenAlexW2900107408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.