Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30636933›Full record

ReviewCancer cell international2019

CRISPR-Cas9 a boon or bane: the bumpy road ahead to cancer therapeutics.

Debarati Ghosh, Prabhadevi Venkataramani, Saikat Nandi, Sonali Bhattacharjee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer cell international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Genome Editing to Abrogate Muscle Atrophy.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Multiple functions of p21 in cancer radiotherapy.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2021
    Review
  19. HIV/AIDS: Current Updates on the Disease, Treatment and Prevention.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India. Section B · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Debarati GhoshCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY USA.
Prabhadevi VenkataramaniCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY USA.
Saikat NandiCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY USA.
Sonali BhattacharjeeCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0522-3361

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome editing allows for the precise manipulation of DNA sequences in a cell making this technology essential for understanding gene function. CRISPR/Cas9 is a targeted genome-editing platform derived from bacterial adaptive immune system and has been repurposed into a genome-editing tool. The RNA-guided DNA endonuclease, Cas9 can be easily programmed to target new sites by altering its guide RNA sequence, making this technology easier, more efficient, scalable and an indispensable tool in biological research. This technology has helped genetically engineer animal models to understand disease mechanisms and elucidate molecular details that can be exploited for improved therapeutic outcomes. In this review, we describe the CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing mechanism, CRISPR-screening methods, therapeutic targeting of CRISPR in animal models and in cancer immunotherapy. We also discuss the ongoing clinical trials using this tool, limitations of this tool that might impede the clinical applicability of CRISPR-Cas9 and future directions for developing effective CRISPR-Cas9 delivery systems that may improve cancer therapeutics.

Indexed as

CAR-T therapyClinical trialsCRISPR–Cas9Drug resistanceGene editingImmunotherapyPrecision medicineTargeted cancer therapyTumor heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID30636933
PMCPMC6325665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.