ArticleZooKeys2019
Description of two cryptic species of the
Article in ZooKeys, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Integrated evidence reveals a new subspecies ofZooKeys · 2025Article
- A new species of the genusBiodiversity data journal · 2025Article
- A new species ofZooKeys · 2024Article
- A new species of cascade frog (Anura: Ranidae: Amolops) from central Yunnan, China.Zoological letters · 2023Article
- A new cryptic species in theZooKeys · 2022Article
- A cryptic species of theZooKeys · 2022Article
- Taxonomic revision ofZoological research · 2021Article
- A species of the genusZooKeys · 2021Article
- A new species ofZoological research · 2020Article
- Development and characterization of twelve microsatellite loci for Amolops ricketti using next-generation sequencing.Molecular biology reports · 2020Article
- A new species of the genusZoological research · 2020Article
- A new species of the genusZooKeys · 2020Article
- A new species of theZooKeys · 2020Article
- A new species of the genusZooKeys · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two cryptic species, which were previously reported as
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.