ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2019
The diagnostic accuracy of liquid exosomes for lung cancer detection: a meta-analysis.
Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of various liquid biopsy methods in detecting colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.Cancer medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Diagnostic value of various liquid biopsy methods for pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Salivary genetic biomarkers of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Potentialities and critical issues of liquid biopsy in clinical practice: An umbrella review.Translational oncology · 2025Review
- Serum human epididymis Protein-4 outperforms conventional biomarkers in the early detection of non-small cell lung cancer.iScience · 2024Article
- Recent advances to address challenges in extracellular vesicle-based applications for lung cancer.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2024Review
- Different Liquid Biopsies for the Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Mutational Oncology Era.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Biomarkers in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: Are we closer to finding the golden ticket?World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Extracellular Vesicle-Associated miRNAs as a Biomarker for Lung Cancer in Liquid Biopsy.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Review
- The Emerging Role of Extracellular Vesicles in the Glioma Microenvironment: Biogenesis and Clinical Relevance.Cancers · 2020Review
- Are There New Biomarkers in Tissue and Liquid Biopsies for the Early Detection of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer?Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSeveral studies have suggested that liquid exosomes can be used as biomarkers for the diagnosis of lung cancer (LC). The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the comprehensive diagnostic value of liquid exosomes for LC. MATERIALS AND
methodsRelevant studies were searched from multiple electronic databases. The quality of the studies was assessed by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 criteria in RevMan 5.3 software. Stata 14.0 software and Meta-disc 1.4 software were used to synthesize the diagnostic parameters. Publication bias was judged according to the Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test.
resultsThere were 13 eligible articles that comprised 1,338 LC patients and 1,075 paired controls for the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), diagnostic likelihood ratio positive (DLR+), diagnostic likelihood ratio negative (DLR-), diagnostic OR (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) of liquid exosomes in diagnosing LC were 0.82 (95% CI: 0.76-0.87), 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77-0.89), 5.27 (95% CI: 3.58-7.75), 0.21 (95% CI: 0.15-0.29), 25.14 (95% CI: 14.25-44.33), and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.92), respectively. Research based on serum, miRNA, the isolation kit method, one index in exosomes, patient sample size of 50 or greater, and control group size of 50 or greater obtained higher AUC values when the LC type was small cell lung cancer.
conclusionLiquid exosomes have shown potential as novel biomarkers that could facilitate LC diagnosis. Further prospective studies are still needed to confirm the diagnostic value of liquid exosomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.