ArticleOrganizational research methods2019
Overview of MEG.
Article in Organizational research methods, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neurophysiological alterations during sensory processing in autism - a meta-analysis.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Conductivity Deviations as Virtual Sources in Magnetoencephalography.Brain topography · 2026Article
- Non-invasive 4D transcranial functional ultrasound and ultrasound localization microscopy for multimodal imaging of neurovascular response.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Cellular and Molecular Effects of Magnetic Fields.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Brain-Computer Interfaces in Visualized Medicine.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Article
- fMRI BOLD and MEG theta power reflect complementary aspects of activity during lexicosemantic decision in adolescents with ASD.Neuroimage. Reports · 2022Article
- Pathological changes of brain oscillations following ischemic stroke.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2022Review
- Inflection across Categories: Tracking Abstract Morphological Processing in Language Production with MEG.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a method to study electrical activity in the human brain by recording the neuromagnetic field outside the head. MEG, like electroencephalography (EEG), provides an excellent, millisecond-scale time resolution, and allows the estimation of the spatial distribution of the underlying activity, in favorable cases with a localization accuracy of a few millimeters. To detect the weak neuromagnetic signals, superconducting sensors, magnetically shielded rooms, and advanced signal processing techniques are used. The analysis and interpretation of MEG data typically involves comparisons between subject groups and experimental conditions using various spatial, temporal, and spectral measures of cortical activity and connectivity. The application of MEG to cognitive neuroscience studies is illustrated with studies of spoken language processing in subjects with normal and impaired reading ability. The mapping of spatiotemporal patterns of activity within networks of cortical areas can provide useful information about the functional architecture of the brain related to sensory and cognitive processing, including language, memory, attention, and perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.