ArticleBritish journal of cancer2019
Circulating inflammation signature predicts overall survival and relapse-free survival in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Preclinical identification and clinical validation of dynamic biomarkers for trifluridine/tipiracil with or without bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a blood biomarker risk prediction model for postmenopausal endometrioid endometrial cancer.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Cell-free and extracellular vesicle microRNAs with clinical utility for solid tumors.Molecular oncology · 2025Review
- Tocilizumab Exerts Anti-Tumor Effects on Colorectal Carcinoma Cell Xenografts Corresponding to Expression Levels of Interleukin-6 Receptor.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Association of Inflammatory Biomarkers With Survival Among Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer.JAMA oncology · 2023Article
- Dipeptidyl peptidase 1 inhibition as a potential therapeutic approach in neutrophil-mediated inflammatory disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Cytokine concentration in peripheral blood of patients with colorectal cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Interleukin-8 in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Its Potential Role as a Prognostic Biomarker.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Which patients are prone to suffer liver metastasis? A review of risk factors of metachronous liver metastasis of colorectal cancer.European journal of medical research · 2022Review
- Review
- Consensus molecular subtype differences linking colon adenocarcinoma and obesity revealed by a cohort transcriptomic analysis.PloS one · 2022Article
- Is red blood cell distribution width a prognostic factor for colorectal cancer? A meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
- Value Research of NLR, PLR, and RDW in Prognostic Assessment of Patients with Colorectal Cancer.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
- Leveling Up the Controversial Role of Neutrophils in Cancer: When the Complexity Becomes Entangled.Cells · 2021Review
- Ketogenic Diet in Cancer Prevention and Therapy: Molecular Targets and Therapeutic Opportunities.Current issues in molecular biology · 2021Review
- Article
- Article
- Links between Inflammation and Postoperative Cancer Recurrence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Prognostic and Predictive Value of Circulating Inflammation Signature in Non-Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Potential Role for Individualized Induction Chemotherapy.Journal of inflammation research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMetastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a highly heterogeneous disease from a clinical, molecular, and immunological perspective. Current predictive models rely primarily in tissue based genetic analysis, which not always correlate with inflammatory response. Here we evaluated the role of a circulating inflammatory signature as a prognostic marker in mCRC.
methodsTwo hundred eleven newly diagnosed patients with mCRC were enrolled in the study. One hundred twenty-one patients had unresectable metastases, whereas ninety patients had potentially resectable liver metastases at presentation. Analysis of miR-21, IL-6, and IL-8 in the plasma of peripheral blood was performed at baseline. Patients with high circulating levels of ≥2 of the three inflammation markers (miR-21, IL-6, and IL-8) were considered to have the "Inflammation phenotype-positive CISIG".
resultsPositive CISIG was found in 39/90 (43%) and 50/121 (45%) patients in the resectable and unresectable cohort, respectively. In the resectable population the median relapse-free survival was 18.4 compared to 31.4 months (p = 0.001 HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.2-3.67) for positive vs. negative CISIG. In contrast, the individual components were not significant. In the same population the median overall survival was 46.2 compared to 66.0 months (p = 0.0003, HR 2.57, 95% CI 1.26-5.27) for positive vs. negative CISIG, but not significant for the individual components. In the unresectable population, the median overall survival was 13.5 compared to 25.0 months (p = 0.0008, HR 2.49, 95% CI 1.46-4.22) for positive vs. negative CISIG. IL-6 was independently prognostic with overall survival of 16.2 compared to 27.0 months (p = 0.004, HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.24-3.11) for high vs. low IL-6, but not the other components. Using a Cox regression model, we demonstrated that CISIG is an independent predictive marker of survival in patients with unresectable disease (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2, 2.8, p < 0.01).
conclusionIn two different cohorts, we demonstrated that CISIG is a strong prognostic factor of relapse-free and overall survival of patients with mCRC. Based on these data, analysis of circulating inflammatory signaling can be complimentary to traditional molecular testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.