Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30636674›Full record

ArticleDeutsches Arzteblatt international2018

Hospital Volume, In-Hospital Mortality, and Failure to Rescue in Esophageal Surgery.

Ulrike Nimptsch, Thomas Haist, Christian Krautz, Robert Grützmann, Thomas Mansky, Dietmar Lorenz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Enhanced recovery after surgery-Does the ERAS concept keep its promises].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. [Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer-Indicators for quality in diagnostics and treatment].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. [Robot-assisted esophageal surgery].Magyar onkologia · 2024
    Review
  15. Western European Variation in the Organization of Esophageal Cancer Surgical Care.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ulrike NimptschDepartment of Structural Advancement and Quality Management in the Health System, TU Berlin, Berlin; Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Sana Hospital Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach am Main; Department of Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen; General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Darmstadt Hospital GmbH, Darmstadt.
Thomas Haist
Christian Krautz
Robert Grützmann
Thomas Mansky
Dietmar Lorenz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Germany, complex esophageal surgery is often performed in hospitals with low case numbers. For these procedures, an association exists between hospital case numbers and treatment outcomes, possibly because of differences in complication management. This aspect of the association between volume and outcome in esophageal surgery has not yet been studied in Germany.

methodsOn the basis of nationwide hospital discharge data (DRG statistics) from the years 2010 to 2015, the association between volume and outcome was analyzed in relation to in-hospital mortality, the frequency of complications, and the mortality of patients who had complications.

results22 700 cases of complex esophageal surgery were identified. The probability of dying after esophageal surgery was much lower in hospitals with very high case numbers (median, 62 per year) than in those with very low case numbers (median, two per year), with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.50 (95% confidence interval, [0.42; 0.60]). At least one complication was documented for more than half of all patients; no association was found between the frequency of complications and the hospital case volume. The in-hospital mortality among patients who had complications was 12.3% [11.1; 13.7] in hospitals with very high case numbers and 20.0% [18.5; 21.6] in hospitals with very low case numbers. Of the 4032 procedures performed in 2015, 83% were for cancer of the esophagus.

conclusionThese findings indicate that the quality of care for patients undergoing esophageal surgery in Germany could be improved if more patients were treated in hospitals with high case numbers. The observed association between case numbers and outcomes is tightly linked to failure to rescue.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityAdultAgedEsophagusFemaleGermanyHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioRegistriesRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID30636674
PMCPMC6334224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.