Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30636672›Full record

Trial reportDeutsches Arzteblatt international2018

The Effectiveness of Leech Therapy in Chronic Low Back Pain.

Christoph-Daniel Hohmann, Rainer Stange, Nico Steckhan, Sibylle Robens, Thomas Ostermann, Arion Paetow, Andreas Michalsen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of education in patients undergoing physiotherapy for lower back pain: a level I systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Proven in Other Diseases.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2019
    Article
  13. Admirable Use of Leeches.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2019
    Article
  14. Methodological Limitations of the Study.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christoph-Daniel HohmannCharité - University Medicine Berlin, corporate member of the Free University Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Foundation Chair of Clinical Naturopathy; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Naturopathy, Immanuel Hospital Berlin; Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University; KPW Garbsen, Center for Physiotherapy.
Rainer Stange
Nico Steckhan
Sibylle Robens
Thomas Ostermann
Arion Paetow
Andreas Michalsen
Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeech therapy has been found to be effective in the treatment of a number of chronic musculoskeletal pain syndromes. Leeches are also often used empirically to treat chronic low back pain, but data from clinical trials have been lacking to date. We therefore conducted the first randomized trial of leech therapy for chronic low back pain.

methodsPatients with chronic low back pain were randomized to receive either a single session of local treatment with 4-7 leeches or four weekly sessions of exercise therapy (1 hour each) led by a physical therapist. The primary endpoint was a change in average back pain intensity, as measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), after 28 days. Secondary end- points included functional impairment (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire), quality of life (Short-Form Health Questionnaire [SF 36]), pain perception (pain perception scale = Schmerzempfindungsskala [SES]), depressivity (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale [CES-D]), and analgesic consumption (questionnaire/ diary). Trial visits took place before treatment and on days 28 ± 3 and 56 ± 5 after the start of treatment; the overall duration of the trial was 56 ± 5 days.

resultsThe mean low back pain score improved from 61.2 ± 15.6 before treatment to 33.1 ± 22.4 on day 28 in the leech ther- apy group (n = 25) and from 61.6 ± 14.8 to 59.8 ± 16.7 in the exercise therapy group (n = 19) (group difference -25.2; 95% con- fidence interval [-41.0; -9.45]; p = 0.0018). Significant benefits of leech therapy were also found at both time points with respect to physical impairment and function as well as physical quality of life. The patients' expectations from treatment were higher in the leech therapy group but did not significantly affect the findings.

conclusionA single session of leech therapy is more effective over the short term in lowering the intensity of pain over the short term and in improving physical function and quality of life over the intermediate term (4 weeks and 8 weeks, respectively). The limitations of this trial are the lack of blinding and the small number of patients. Leech therapy appears to be an effective treat- ment for chronic low back pain.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceChronic PainFemaleHumansLeechingLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementPain MeasurementSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID30636672
PMCPMC6334223
OpenAlexW2900976547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.