Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30636637›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2019

Strategies for incorporating patient-reported outcomes in the care of people with chronic kidney disease (PRO kidney): a protocol for a realist synthesis.

Kara Schick-Makaroff, Onouma Thummapol, Stephanie Thompson, Rachel Flynn, Mehri Karimi-Dehkordi, Scott Klarenbach, Richard Sawatzky, Joanne Greenhalgh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kara Schick-MakaroffFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy 11405-87 Ave, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada. kara.schickmakaroff@ualberta.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-6200-3416
Onouma ThummapolFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy 11405-87 Ave, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada.
Stephanie ThompsonFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Division of Nephrology, University of Alberta, 11-112 Clinical Science Building, 11350-83 Ave, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G3, Canada.
Rachel FlynnFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy 11405-87 Ave, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada.
Mehri Karimi-DehkordiTelfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, 55 Laurier Avenue East, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada.
Scott KlarenbachFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Division of Nephrology, University of Alberta, 11-112 Clinical Science Building, 11350-83 Ave, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G3, Canada.
Richard SawatzkySchool of Nursing, Trinity Western University, 7600 Glover Road, Langley, BC, V2Y 1Y1, Canada.
Joanne GreenhalghSociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, 11.21, Social Sciences Building, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-reported outcomes and experience measures (jointly referred to here as PROs) are internationally recognized as a means for patients to provide information about their quality of life, symptoms, and experiences with care. Although increasingly recognized as key to improving the quality of healthcare at individual (e.g., patients, caregivers, and providers) and aggregate (e.g., government, policy/system-wide decision-making) levels, there are important knowledge gaps in our understanding of how PROs are, and can be, used across different settings, particularly in nephrology to enhance person-centered care. This knowledge is needed for developing strategies to guide optimal use of PROs in nephrology care. Currently, no strategies exist. The purpose of this review is to address this knowledge gap by answering the following realist question: How can PROs be used to enhance person-centered nephrology care, both at individual and aggregate levels? METHODOLOGY: Realist synthesis is an explanatory approach to data synthesis that aims to explain how context and mechanisms influence the outcome of an intervention. An initial program theory will be developed through the systematic search of the published literature in bibliographic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, EBSCOhost CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus) on existing theories explaining how PROs are used in healthcare settings. This initial program theory will then be tested and refined through the process of realist synthesis, using context-mechanism-outcome configurations. A kidney-specific program theory will then be created to address the utilization of PROs in nephrology across individual and aggregate levels to augment person-centered care. Searching will be iterative and refined as data is extracted and analyzed using a pilot-tested context + mechanism = outcome heuristic. Throughout, we will consult methodological experts, research team practitioners, and the Patient Advisory Committee to help refine the theories. Last, we will develop and disseminate knowledge translation products widely to knowledge user groups. DISCUSSION: The utilization of PROs remains a challenge in nephrology. The findings from this synthesis will provide a framework to guide both policy makers and practitioners on how to enhance person-centered care through successful utilization of PROs across individual and aggregate levels in nephrology. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017056063.

Indexed as

Patient-Centered CarePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRenal Insufficiency, ChronicHumansNephrologyReview Literature as TopicClinical kidney practiceKnowledge translationPatient-reported experience measures (PREMs)Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)Patient-reported outcomes (PROs)Person-centered careQuality of careQuality of lifeRealist synthesis/review

Identifiers

PMID30636637
PMCPMC6330465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.