Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30635978›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2019

Analysis of cavopulmonary and cardiac flow characteristics in fontan Patients: Comparison with healthy volunteers.

David R Rutkowski, Gregory Barton, Christopher J François, Heather L Bartlett, Petros V Anagnostopoulos, Alejandro Roldán-Alzate

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Stent interventions for pulmonary artery stenosis improve bi-ventricular flow efficiency in a swine model.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David R RutkowskiMechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Gregory BartonRadiology, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Christopher J FrançoisRadiology, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Heather L BartlettPediatrics and Medicine, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Petros V AnagnostopoulosSurgery, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Alejandro Roldán-AlzateMechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
Wisconsin Multidisciplinary K12 Urologic Research Career Development ProgramK12DK100022 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CHAD M. VEZINA · 2013 to 2026
$8.6M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardTL1TR000429 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000429NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NIDDK NIH HHS K12 DK100022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCharacterizing the flow of the Fontan circuit, and correlating flow characteristics with the development of complications, is an important clinical challenge. Past work has analyzed the flow characteristics of Fontan circulation on a component-by-component basis. 4D flow MRI with radial projections allows for large volumetric coverage, and therefore can be used to analyze the flow through many codependent cardiovascular components in a single imaging session. PURPOSE: To describe flow characteristics across the entire Fontan circuit and to compare these with the flow characteristics in healthy volunteers. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. SUBJECTS: Eleven single ventricle patients with a Fontan connection and 15 healthy controls. SEQUENCE: Phase contrast with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction (PC-VIPR) at a field strength of 3 T. ASSESSMENT: Cavopulmonary and ventricular flow distributions, blood flow kinetic energy, vorticities, efficiency indices, and other flow parameters were analyzed using Ensight and MatLab. STATISTICAL TESTS: The results were compared across Fontan subjects, between respiratory phases, and between Fontan subjects and healthy volunteers using a Student's t-test for unequal sample sizes and linear regression.

resultsCava-specific pulmonary flow distributions of Fontan patients varied significantly between respiratory phases (P < 0.05). Ventricular kinetic energy (KE) was significantly higher in Fontan patients than it was in healthy controls, leading to a lower cardiac efficiency metric in the Fontan group. A significant diastolic KE time-shift was also observed in the Fontan patient group. Peak diastolic KE was significantly higher in the single ventricle of patients with right ventricle morphology than it was in left ventricle morphology patients. DATA

conclusionRadial 4D flow MRI can be used for comprehensive analysis of single ventricle Fontan flow characteristics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019.

Indexed as

Fontan ProcedureMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultCardiovascular SystemCoronary CirculationHealthy VolunteersHeartHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalProspective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30635978
PMCPMC7359045
OpenAlexW2910423377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.