Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30635864›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2019

Identifying Weak Signals in Inhomogeneous Neuronal Images for Large-Scale Tracing of Sparsely Distributed Neurites.

Shiwei Li, Tingwei Quan, Hang Zhou, FangFang Yin, Anan Li, Ling Fu, Qingming Luo, Hui Gong, Shaoqun Zeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Tracing weak neuron fibers.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shiwei LiBritton Chance Center for Biomedical Photonics, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics-Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, Hubei, China.
Tingwei QuanBritton Chance Center for Biomedical Photonics, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics-Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, Hubei, China. quantingwei@hust.edu.cn.
Hang ZhouBritton Chance Center for Biomedical Photonics, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics-Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, Hubei, China.
FangFang YinBritton Chance Center for Biomedical Photonics, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics-Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, Hubei, China.
Anan LiBritton Chance Center for Biomedical Photonics, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics-Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, Hubei, China.
Ling FuBritton Chance Center for Biomedical Photonics, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics-Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, Hubei, China.
Qingming LuoBritton Chance Center for Biomedical Photonics, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics-Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, Hubei, China.
Hui GongBritton Chance Center for Biomedical Photonics, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics-Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, Hubei, China.
Shaoqun ZengBritton Chance Center for Biomedical Photonics, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics-Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tracing neurites constitutes the core of neuronal morphology reconstruction, a key step toward neuronal circuit mapping. Modern optical-imaging techniques allow observation of nearly complete mouse neuron morphologies across brain regions or even the whole brain. However, high-level automation reconstruction of neurons, i.e., the reconstruction with a few of manual edits requires discrimination of weak foreground points from the inhomogeneous background. We constructed an identification model, where empirical observations made from neuronal images were summarized into rules for designing feature vectors that to classify foreground and background, and a support vector machine (SVM) was used to learn these feature vectors. We embedded this constructed SVM classifier into a previously developed tool, SparseTracer, to obtain SparseTracer-Learned Feature Vector (ST-LFV). ST-LFV can trace sparsely distributed neurites with weak signals (contrast-to-noise ratio < 1.5) against an inhomogeneous background in datasets imaged by widely used light-microscopy techniques like confocal microscopy and two-photon microscopy. Moreover, 12 sub-blocks were extracted from different brain regions. The average recall and precision rates were 99% and 97%, respectively. These results indicated that ST-LFV is well suited for weak signal identification with varying image characteristics. We also applied ST-LFV to trace long-range neurites from images where neurites are sparsely distributed but their image intensities are weak in some cases. When tracing this long-range neurites, manual edit was required once to obtain results equivalent to the ground truth, compared with 20 times of manual edits required by SparseTracer. This improvement in the level of automatic reconstruction indicates that ST-LFV has the potential to rapidly reconstruct sparsely distributed neurons at the large scale.

Indexed as

Support Vector MachineAlgorithmsAnimalsAutomationBrainBrain ChemistryImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMiceMicroscopy, ConfocalNeuritesLarge-scale neuronal reconstructionNeuron tracingSupport vector machineWeak signal identification

Identifiers

PMID30635864
PMCPMC6841657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.