ArticleClinical rheumatology2019
Mechanic hands: clinical and capillaroscopy manifestations of patients with connective tissue diseases presented with and without mechanic hands.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of interocular symmetry of choroidal vascularity index and thickness in patients with systemic sclerosis: a prospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Scleroderma-overlap syndromes: capillaroscopy, laboratory, and clinical manifestations and follow-up compared to scleroderma patients.Reumatologia · 2023Article
- Update on Cutaneous Signs to Assist in the Diagnosis of Dermatomyositis.Current rheumatology reports · 2022Review
- Nailfold Capillaroscopy With USB Digital Microscopy in Connective Tissue Diseases: A Comparative Study of 245 Patients and Healthy Controls.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Nailfold capillaroscopy in rheumatology: ready for the daily use but with care in terminology.Clinical rheumatology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe condition known as 'Mechanic's Hands' is a thickened, hyperkeratotic eruption, which is bilaterally symmetric along the fingers, and often occurs in patients with some connective tissue diseases. Nail fold capillaroscopy is a non-invasive technique for evaluation of connective tissue diseases. We evaluated the prevalence of mechanic hands in patients with connective tissue diseases and compared the clinical manifestations and capillaroscopic changes in the patients with and without mechanic hands.
methodsThe clinical manifestations and capillaroscopy of 576 patients with scleroderma, dermatomyositis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjogren's syndrome, undifferentiated and mixed connective tissue diseases were evaluated and compared in patients with and without mechanic hands.
resultsA total of 576 patients were enrolled. Mechanic hands were observed in 17.2% of patients: 50% of mixed connective tissue disease, 35% of dermatomyositis, 15.4% of scleroderma, 14.9% of undifferentiated connective tissue disease, 14.3% of Sjogren's syndrome, and no patient with SLE. Among them, 80.8% had abnormal capillaroscopic findings. In dermatomyositis patients, Raynaud's phenomenon, anti-Jo-1 positivity, and some capillaroscopy findings were detected more frequently in patients with mechanic hand. In scleroderma, positive Scl70 and capillary loss were observed more frequently in patients without mechanic hands.
conclusionsMechanic hands can be a presenting sign of some systemic connective tissue diseases. Probably, finding this sign on examination, especially together with Raynaud's phenomenon or abnormal capillaroscopy, can be helpful in the early diagnosis of the connective tissue diseases and can be used as a predictive and prognostic tool in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.