Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30635793›Full record

ArticleEndocrine2019

The prognosis and management of neuroendocrine neoplasms-related metastatic bone disease: lessons from clinical practice.

Krystallenia I Alexandraki, Michail Pizanias, Inbal Uri, Dimitrios Thomas, Tristan Page, Denise Kolomodi, Chen Sheng Low, Olu Adesanya, Marina Tsoli, David J Gross and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Neuroendocrine neoplasia and bone (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Krystallenia I AlexandrakiEndocrine Unit, 1st Department of Propaedeutic Medicine, Laiko University Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Mikras Asias 75, Athens, 11527, Greece. alexandrakik@gmail.com.
Michail PizaniasInstitute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
Inbal UriNeuroendocrine Tumor Unit, Endocrinology and Metabolism Department, Division of Medicine, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, P.O.B. 12000, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel.
Dimitrios ThomasEndocrine Unit, 1st Department of Propaedeutic Medicine, Laiko University Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Mikras Asias 75, Athens, 11527, Greece.
Tristan PageThe ARDEN NET Centre, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Denise KolomodiEndocrine Unit, 1st Department of Propaedeutic Medicine, Laiko University Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Mikras Asias 75, Athens, 11527, Greece.
Chen Sheng LowThe ARDEN NET Centre, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Olu AdesanyaThe ARDEN NET Centre, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Marina TsoliEndocrine Unit, 1st Department of Propaedeutic Medicine, Laiko University Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Mikras Asias 75, Athens, 11527, Greece.
David J GrossNeuroendocrine Tumor Unit, Endocrinology and Metabolism Department, Division of Medicine, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, P.O.B. 12000, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel.
Harpal RandevaThe ARDEN NET Centre, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Rajaventhan SrirajaskanthanInstitute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
Simona Grozinsky-GlasbergNeuroendocrine Tumor Unit, Endocrinology and Metabolism Department, Division of Medicine, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, P.O.B. 12000, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel.
Gregory KaltsasEndocrine Unit, 1st Department of Propaedeutic Medicine, Laiko University Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Mikras Asias 75, Athens, 11527, Greece.
Martin O WeickertThe ARDEN NET Centre, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust · GBHadassah Medical Center · ILCoventry University · GBKing's College Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo study the evolution and optimal management of metastatic bone disease (mBD) in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs).

methodsSeventy-four patients were recruited from four NEN centers in this observational multicenter study.

resultsPancreas and small bowel were the most common primaries (30 and 27%, respectively). Almost all gastrointestinal (GI)-NENs were grades 1 and 2, whereas bronchopulmonary-thymic were atypical carcinoids. Thirty-two (43%) patients had synchronous metastatic bone disease (mBD) and three patients reported bone-specific symptoms; metachronous mBD developed at a median of 35 (range: 4-395) months. Thirty-six (86%) of patients with metachronous mBD had stage IV disease at diagnosis. Somatostatin receptor functional imaging and computed tomography were the modalities mostly used for mBD identification. Fifty-two patients received assessable bone-related therapy (bisphosphonates, denosumab, local radiotherapy, and radionuclide treatment). Improvement in mBD was seen in 5, stable disease in 22, and deterioration in 25 patients. The presence of synchronous mBD and the negative outcome of bone-related therapy negatively affected overall survival (OS). In the multivariate analysis, the stronger predictor of OS was the outcome of bone-related therapy (HR: 4.753; 95% CI: 1.589-14.213). Bisphosphonates therapy was the mostly used bone-specific treatment but its monthly administration did not affect OS. At last follow-up, 39 patients were alive with OS 50 (14-463) months.

conclusionsEarly investigation for mBD offers a prognostic marker of patients with NENs, since synchronous mBD has a negative impact on survival. The outcome of bone-related therapy affects OS but the monthly administration of bisphosphonates did not show a benefit over less intense schemes.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBone NeoplasmsDiphosphonatesDisease ManagementFemaleHumansIntestinal NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung AdultDiphosphonatesBisphosphonatesDenosumabMetastatic bone diseaseNeuroendocrine neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID30635793
OpenAlexW2910304287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.