Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30635719›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of colorectal disease2019

A review of the effect of faecal incontinence and constipation on sexual function.

G P Thomas, Y Maeda, C J Vaizey

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of colorectal disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

G P ThomasThe Sir Alan Parks Department of Physiology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Watford Road, Harrow, HA1 3UJ, UK. gregorythomas1@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0331-5847
Y MaedaThe Sir Alan Parks Department of Physiology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Watford Road, Harrow, HA1 3UJ, UK.
C J VaizeyThe Sir Alan Parks Department of Physiology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Watford Road, Harrow, HA1 3UJ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimFaecal incontinence and constipation are common conditions which may adversely affect quality of life. They may have an adverse effect on sexual function.

methodThis review of the published literature aimed to assess the published evidence.

resultsOnly seven published studies have reported the effect of these conditions on sexual function. Four reported on those with faecal incontinence. Two reported on those with faecal incontinence and constipation and one reported solely on constipation. All were questionnaire-based studies or retrospective reviews of institutional databases. A heterogenous mix of different measures of sexual function were applied. Conflicting findings were reported. Some studies suggested that those with faecal incontinence and constipation may have adverse sexual experiences. Others suggest that these pelvic floor disorders have no significant effect.

conclusionFurther work is needed to investigate this. Large questionnaire studies with normal subject controls and adjustment for confounding factors are likely to be needed.

Indexed as

ConstipationFecal IncontinenceFemaleHumansPelvic Floor DisordersSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalConstipationFaecal incontinenceSexual dysfunctionSexual function

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.