ArticleHNO2019
[Maximum monosyllabic score as a predictor for cochlear implant outcome].
Article in HNO, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of Cortices with Characteristics of Rhythmic Entrainment and Its Periodicity.Experimental neurobiology · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Versus Simple Clinical Models for Cochlear Implant Outcome Prediction.Audiology research · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparison of hearing performance in patients with borderline indication for active middle ear or cochlear implants: clinical outcomes to guide preoperative counseling and decision making.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024Article
- Article
- Validation of a predictive model for speech discrimination after cochlear impIant provision.HNO · 2023Article
- Extended Preoperative Audiometry for Outcome Prediction and Risk Analysis in Patients Receiving Cochlear Implants.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- [Validation of a predictive model for speech discrimination after cochlear implant provision].HNO · 2023Article
- Hearing rehabilitation for unilateral deafness using a cochlear implant: the influence of the subjective duration of deafness on speech intelligibility.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023Article
- Cochlear coverage with lateral wall cochlear implant electrode arrays affects post-operative speech recognition.PloS one · 2023Article
- Speech comprehension across multiple CI processor generations: Scene dependent signal processing.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2021Article
- Cochlear Implantation.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study investigated the speech perception of cochlear implant (CI) recipients with measurable preoperative ipsilateral speech perception. These data should support improved individual counselling of CI candidates. MATERIALS AND
methodsPre- and postoperative speech audiometric parameters were analyzed, including maximum score for phonemically balanced words (PB
resultsThe preoperative PB
conclusionThe preoperatively measured PB
Indexed as
Identifiers
30635677What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.