Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30635604›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

MultiLink Analysis: Brain Network Comparison via Sparse Connectivity Analysis.

Alessandro Crimi, Luca Giancardo, Fabio Sambataro, Alessandro Gozzi, Vittorio Murino, Diego Sona

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alessandro CrimiPattern Analysis and Computer Vision, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy. alessandro.crimi@usz.ch.
Luca GiancardoPattern Analysis and Computer Vision, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4862-2277
Fabio SambataroDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medical Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2102-416X
Alessandro GozziFunctional Neuroimaging Laboratory, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Rovereto, Italy.
Vittorio MurinoPattern Analysis and Computer Vision, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy.
Diego SonaPattern Analysis and Computer Vision, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy.

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
Department of Defense W81XWH-12-2-0012NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of the brain from a connectivity perspective is revealing novel insights into brain structure and function. Discovery is, however, hindered by the lack of prior knowledge used to make hypotheses. Additionally, exploratory data analysis is made complex by the high dimensionality of data. Indeed, to assess the effect of pathological states on brain networks, neuroscientists are often required to evaluate experimental effects in case-control studies, with hundreds of thousands of connections. In this paper, we propose an approach to identify the multivariate relationships in brain connections that characterize two distinct groups, hence permitting the investigators to immediately discover the subnetworks that contain information about the differences between experimental groups. In particular, we are interested in data discovery related to connectomics, where the connections that characterize differences between two groups of subjects are found. Nevertheless, those connections do not necessarily maximize the accuracy in classification since this does not guarantee reliable interpretation of specific differences between groups. In practice, our method exploits recent machine learning techniques employing sparsity to deal with weighted networks describing the whole-brain macro connectivity. We evaluated our technique on functional and structural connectomes from human and murine brain data. In our experiments, we automatically identified disease-relevant connections in datasets with supervised and unsupervised anatomy-driven parcellation approaches and by using high-dimensional datasets.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainConnectomeHumansMiceNerve NetNeural Pathways

Identifiers

PMID30635604
PMCPMC6329758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.