Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30635579›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Feature-specific prediction errors and surprise across macaque fronto-striatal circuits.

Mariann Oemisch, Stephanie Westendorff, Marzyeh Azimi, Seyed Alireza Hassani, Salva Ardid, Paul Tiesinga, Thilo Womelsdorf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Extracellular Spike Waveforms: Morphology, Biophysics, and Classification Strategies.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Contributions of Attention to Learning in Multidimensional Reward Environments.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  10. Feature-specific predictive processing: What's in a prediction error?Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Neurons of Macaque Frontal Eye Field Signal Reward-Related Surprise.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mariann OemischDepartment of Biology, Centre for Vision Research, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON, M6J 1P3, Canada. mariann.oemisch@yale.edu.
Stephanie WestendorffDepartment of Biology, Centre for Vision Research, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON, M6J 1P3, Canada.
Marzyeh AzimiDepartment of Biology, Centre for Vision Research, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON, M6J 1P3, Canada.
Seyed Alireza HassaniDepartment of Biology, Centre for Vision Research, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON, M6J 1P3, Canada.
Salva ArdidDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4821-6655
Paul TiesingaDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, 6525 EN, Netherlands.
Thilo WomelsdorfDepartment of Biology, Centre for Vision Research, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON, M6J 1P3, Canada. thilo.womelsdorf@vanderbilt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6921-4187

Funding

INTEGRATED CENTER FOR IN VIVO MICROSCOPYP41EB015897 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, GEORGE ALLAN · 2012 to 2017
$7.4M
Agilent Direct Drive 9.4T MRS/MRI ConsoleS10OD010683 · OD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, GEORGE ALLAN · 2012 to 2012
$597k
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015897NIH HHS S10 OD010683
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To adjust expectations efficiently, prediction errors need to be associated with the precise features that gave rise to the unexpected outcome, but this credit assignment may be problematic if stimuli differ on multiple dimensions and it is ambiguous which feature dimension caused the outcome. Here, we report a potential solution: neurons in four recorded areas of the anterior fronto-striatal networks encode prediction errors that are specific to feature values of different dimensions of attended multidimensional stimuli. The most ubiquitous prediction error occurred for the reward-relevant dimension. Feature-specific prediction error signals a) emerge on average shortly after non-specific prediction error signals, b) arise earliest in the anterior cingulate cortex and later in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, caudate and ventral striatum, and c) contribute to feature-based stimulus selection after learning. Thus, a widely-distributed feature-specific eligibility trace may be used to update synaptic weights for improved feature-based attention.

Indexed as

AnimalsCorpus StriatumGyrus CinguliLearningMacaca mulattaMaleNeuronsPrefrontal Cortex

Identifiers

PMID30635579
PMCPMC6329800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.