Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30635570›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Dissecting the circuit for blindsight to reveal the critical role of pulvinar and superior colliculus.

Masaharu Kinoshita, Rikako Kato, Kaoru Isa, Kenta Kobayashi, Kazuto Kobayashi, Hirotaka Onoe, Tadashi Isa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. From error to evidence: blindsight in the making†.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Properties and Application of Pseudotyped Lentiviral Vectors.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  8. Illuminating consciousness.Frontiers in psychology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Complementary Organization of Mouse Driver and Modulator Cortico-thalamo-cortical Circuits.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Masaharu KinoshitaDepartment of Developmental Physiology, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki, 444-8585, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8588-843X
Rikako KatoDepartment of Developmental Physiology, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki, 444-8585, Japan.
Kaoru IsaDepartment of Developmental Physiology, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki, 444-8585, Japan.
Kenta KobayashiDepartment of Viral Vector Development, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki, 444-8585, Japan.
Kazuto KobayashiDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan.
Hirotaka OnoeHuman Brain Research Center, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Tadashi IsaDepartment of Developmental Physiology, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki, 444-8585, Japan. isa.tadashi.7u@kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Kyoto University · JPFukushima Medical University · JPHirosaki University · JPThe Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In patients with damage to the primary visual cortex (V1), residual vision can guide goal-directed movements to targets in the blind field without awareness. This phenomenon has been termed blindsight, and its neural mechanisms are controversial. There should be visual pathways to the higher visual cortices bypassing V1, however some literature propose that the signal is mediated by the superior colliculus (SC) and pulvinar, while others claim the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) transmits the signal. Here, we directly test the role of SC to ventrolateral pulvinar (vlPul) pathway in blindsight monkeys. Pharmacological inactivation of vlPul impairs visually guided saccades (VGS) in the blind field. Selective and reversible blockade of the SC-vlPul pathway by combining two viral vectors also impairs VGS. With these results we claim the SC-vlPul pathway contributes to blindsight. The discrepancy would be due to the extent of retrograde degeneration of dLGN and task used for assessment.

Indexed as

AnimalsGeniculate BodiesMacaca mulattaMaleMuscimolPhotic StimulationPulvinarSaccadesSuperior ColliculiVision DisordersVision, OcularVisual CortexVisual PathwaysMuscimol

Identifiers

PMID30635570
PMCPMC6329824
OpenAlexW2910968495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.