Trial reportNeurology2019
Rituximab vs placebo induction prior to glatiramer acetate monotherapy in multiple sclerosis.
Trial report in Neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01569451 (A Double Blinded, Randomized Study Comparing Rituximab Induction Therapy Followed by Glatiramer Acetate Therapy to Glatiramer Acetate Monotherapy in Patients With Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Double Blinded, Randomized Study Comparing Rituximab Induction Therapy Followed by Glatiramer Acetate Therapy to Glatiramer Acetate Monotherapy in Patients With Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rituximab for people with multiple sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical trial evidence of quality-of-life effects of disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis: a systematic analysis.Journal of neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Rituximab for people with multiple sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Discontinuation of ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis: reoccurrence of disease activity.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2026Observational
- De-escalating and discontinuing disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Review
- Disease Activity in Pregnant and Postpartum Women With Multiple Sclerosis Receiving Ocrelizumab or Other Disease-Modifying Therapies.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2024Article
- Evaluating the Therapeutic Potential of Ublituximab in the Treatment of MS: Design, Development and Place in Therapy.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024Review
- Article
- Evolution of Anti-B Cell Therapeutics in Autoimmune Neurological Diseases.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022Review
- What Have Failed, Interrupted, and Withdrawn Antibody Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis Taught Us?Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022Review
- Anti-CD20 therapies for multiple sclerosis: current status and future perspectives.Journal of neurology · 2022Review
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of rituximab versus natalizumab in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Rituximab for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a review.Journal of neurology · 2022Review
- The comparative efficacy and safety of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A network meta-analysis.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2021Review
- Cells to the Rescue: Emerging Cell-Based Treatment Approaches for NMOSD and MOGAD.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Rituximab in Multiple Sclerosis: Are We Ready for Regulatory Approval?Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Rituximab, MS, and pregnancy.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2020Article
- Glatiramer acetate immune modulates B-cell antigen presentation in treatment of MS.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine whether rituximab induction followed by glatiramer acetate (GA) monotherapy is more effective than GA alone for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis with active disease.
methodsThis was a single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Fifty-five participants were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to either rituximab (R-GA) or placebo (P-GA) induction, followed by GA therapy initiated in all participants. Participants were followed up to 3 years. The primary endpoint was the number of participants with no evidence of disease activity (NEDA): those without relapse, new MRI lesions, and sustained change in disability.
resultsTwenty-eight and 27 participants received rituximab and placebo induction, respectively, with one participant in each arm withdrawing before 6-month MRI. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics. At end of study, 44.44% of R-GA participants demonstrated NEDA vs 19.23% of P-GA participants (
conclusionsInduction therapy with rituximab followed by GA may provide superior efficacy in the short term than GA alone in relapsing multiple sclerosis, but this benefit appears to wane within the study period. Larger studies are needed to assess sustainability of results. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01569451.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.