Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30635367›Full record

Trial reportTobacco control2019

Pictorial health warning labels on the waterpipe device are effective in reducing smoking satisfaction, puffing behaviour and exposure to CO: first evidence from a crossover clinical laboratory study.

Wasim Maziak, Ziyad Ben Taleb, Mohammad Ebrahimi Kalan, Thomas Eissenberg, James Thrasher, Alan Shihadeh, Taghrid Asfar

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Tobacco control, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Visual Attention to Health Warning Labels on Waterpipe Venue Menus in Immersive Virtual Reality.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Trial
  6. Waterpipe Tobacco Warnings: An Experimental Study Among a Nationally Representative Sample of US Young Adults.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2021
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. "Scary and Effective, Definitely Pushes Me to Quit Smoking": Developing Waterpipe Pictorial Health Warnings Targeting Young Adults in Lebanon.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Perceived Harms of Waterpipe Tobacco Heating Sources Among Young Adult Waterpipe Tobacco Smokers.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Waterpipe smoking: the pressing need for risk communication.Expert review of respiratory medicine · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wasim MaziakDepartment of Epidemiology, Robert Stempel College of Public Health, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA.
Ziyad Ben TalebDepartment of Epidemiology, Robert Stempel College of Public Health, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA.
Mohammad Ebrahimi KalanDepartment of Epidemiology, Robert Stempel College of Public Health, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7709-5392
Thomas EissenbergDepartment of Psychology, Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Virginia Commonwealth University, Miami, Florida, USA.
James ThrasherHealth Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Alan ShihadehCollege of Engeenering, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Taghrid AsfarSyrian Center for Tobacco Studies, Aleppo, Syrian Arab Republic.

Funding

Project 4: Using a prospective cohort survey to test population-level predictions generated by Projects 1-3U54DA036105 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI FAGAN, PEBBLES · 2018 to 2022
$20.8M
Training and Education Core p270-287P50DA036105 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI EISSENBERG, THOMAS EVAN · 2013 to 2017
$19.2M
Translating evidence and building capacity to support waterpipe control in the Eastern MediterraneanR01TW010654 · FIC · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI ASFAR, TAGHRID, MAZIAK, WASIM · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
Understanding tobacco flavor effects on waterpipe smokers’ experiences and exposuresR01DA042477 · NIDA · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI MAZIAK, WASIM · 2016 to 2018
$1.3M
FIC NIH HHS R01 TW010654NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA036105NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA042477NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA036105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study examined the effect of pictorial health warning labels (HWLs) on the waterpipe (WP) device on smokers' experience, puffing behaviour, harm perception and exposure to respiratory toxicants.

methodsThirty WP smokers completed two 45 min ad libitum smoking sessions (WP without HWL vs WP with HWL) in a crossover design study. Exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO) was measured before and after each smoking session. Puff topography was recorded throughout the smoking session, and participants completed survey questionnaires assessing subjective smoking experiences and harm perception.

resultsSignificant differences were observed in eCO levels between the two study conditions, with lower levels of eCO boost recorded following smoking the WP fitted with HWL (16 ppm) compared with WP without HWL (22.7 ppm). Participants had more puffs, shorter interpuff intervals and a higher total puff volume during smoking the WP without HWL relative to WP with HWL (p values <0.05). We documented enhanced reports of satisfaction, taste and puff liking following smoking the WP without HWL compared with the WP with HWL. WP harm perception was significantly higher among participants after smoking the WP with HWL compared with WP without HWL.

conclusionThis pilot study shows that placing HWL on the WP device is effective in reducing WP smoker's positive experiences, puffing parameters and exposure to carbon monoxide. HWLs lead also to more appreciation of WP harmful effects, making them a promising regulatory approach for addressing the spread of WP smoking among young adults in the USA.

Indexed as

Breath TestsProduct LabelingRespirationTobacco ProductsAdolescentAdultCarbon MonoxideConsumer BehaviorCross-Over StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleWater Pipe SmokingYoung AdultCarbon Monoxidepreventionsmoking topographytoxicology

Identifiers

PMID30635367
PMCPMC6625939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.