Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30635343›Full record

ArticleGenome research2019

Transposon insertional mutagenesis in

Monica R Sanchez, Celia Payen, Frances Cheong, Blake T Hovde, Sarah Bissonnette, Adam P Arkin, Jeffrey M Skerker, Rachel B Brem, Amy A Caudy, Maitreya J Dunham

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Progresses of transposon research inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Core gene set of the speciesbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Monica R SanchezDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4413-9058
Celia PayenDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Frances CheongDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Blake T HovdeDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Sarah BissonnetteDepartment of Biological Sciences, California State University, Turlock, California 95382, USA.
Adam P ArkinEnergy Biosciences Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
Jeffrey M SkerkerEnergy Biosciences Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
Rachel B BremBuck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, California 94945, USA.
Amy A CaudyDonnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E1, Canada.
Maitreya J DunhamDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9944-2666
University of Washington · USEnergy Biosciences Institute · USBuck Institute for Research on Aging · USCalifornia State University System · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Mapping deep evolutionary divergences in cellular models of stress responseR01GM120430 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BREM, RACHEL BETH · 2017 to 2025
$3.9M
CIHRHoward Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM120430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand how complex genetic networks perform and regulate diverse cellular processes, the function of each individual component must be defined. Comprehensive phenotypic studies of mutant alleles have been successful in model organisms in determining what processes depend on the normal function of a gene. These results are often ported to newly sequenced genomes by using sequence homology. However, sequence similarity does not always mean identical function or phenotype, suggesting that new methods are required to functionally annotate newly sequenced species. We have implemented comparative analysis by high-throughput experimental testing of gene dispensability in

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, FungalGenes, EssentialTranscriptional ActivationDNA Transposable ElementsFungal ProteinsMutagenesisSaccharomycesSpecies SpecificityTranscription FactorsDNA Transposable ElementsFungal ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID30635343
PMCPMC6396416
OpenAlexW2950655293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.