Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30635255›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2019

Mumps in a highly vaccinated Marshallese community in Arkansas, USA: an outbreak report.

Virgie S Fields, Haytham Safi, Catherine Waters, Jennifer Dillaha, Lucy Capelle, Sheldon Riklon, J Gary Wheeler, Dirk T Haselow

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Spatial Effect of Ecological Environmental Factors on Mumps in China during 2014-2018.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Virgie S FieldsArkansas Department of Health, Little Rock, AR, USA; Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Applied Epidemiology Fellowship, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Haytham SafiArkansas Department of Health, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Catherine WatersArkansas Department of Health, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Jennifer DillahaArkansas Department of Health, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Lucy CapelleArkansas Coalition of Marshallese, Springdale, AR, USA.
Sheldon RiklonUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest Campus, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
J Gary WheelerArkansas Department of Health, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Dirk T HaselowArkansas Department of Health, Little Rock, AR, USA. Electronic address: dirk.haselow@arkansas.gov.
Arkansas Department of Health · USTogether Enhancing Awareness Coalition · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring 2000-15, Arkansas Department of Health, Little Rock, AR, USA, investigated between one and six cases of mumps each year. From Aug 5, 2016, to Aug 5, 2017, the department received notification of more than 4000 suspected mumps cases in the second largest outbreak in the USA in the past 30 years.

methodsArkansas Department of Health investigated all reported cases of mumps to ascertain exposure, travel, and vaccination histories and identify close contacts. Cases were classified as confirmed if the patient had laboratory confirmation of mumps virus or probable if they had clinical symptoms and either a positive serological test or a known epidemiological link to a confirmed case.

findings2954 cases of mumps related to the outbreak were identified during the outbreak period: 1665 (56%) were laboratory confirmed, 1676 (57%) were in children aged 5-17 years, and 1692 (57%) were in Marshallese people. Among the 1676 school-aged cases, 1536 (92%) had previously received at least two doses of a vaccine containing the mumps virus. Although 19 cases of orchitis were reported, severe complications were not identified. Unusual occurrences, such as recurrent parotitis and prolonged viral shedding, were observed mostly in Marshallese individuals. Viral samples were characterised as genotype G.

interpretationThis large-scale outbreak, primarily affecting a marginalised community with intense household crowding, highlights the need for coordinated, interdisciplinary, and non-traditional outbreak responses. This outbreak raises questions about mumps vaccine effectiveness and potential waning immunity.

fundingCouncil of State and Territorial Epidemiologists and US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Indexed as

VaccinationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArkansasChildChild, PreschoolDisease OutbreaksFemaleGenotypeHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineIncidenceInfantMaleMeasles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID30635255
OpenAlexW2910045255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.