Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30634986›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2019

Mobile supervised consumption services in Rural British Columbia: lessons learned.

Silvina C Mema, Gillian Frosst, Jessica Bridgeman, Hilary Drake, Corinne Dolman, Leslie Lappalainen, Trevor Corneil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Expanding supervised consumption services in rural Canada: Bridging gaps.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Silvina C MemaInterior Health Authority, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada. silvina.mema@interiorhealth.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-5895-9159
Gillian FrosstInterior Health Authority, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Jessica BridgemanInterior Health Authority, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Hilary DrakeFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Corinne DolmanInterior Health Authority, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Leslie LappalainenInterior Health Authority, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Trevor CorneilInterior Health Authority, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

Mentoring the next generation of addiction clinician scientists while responding to the opioid epidemicR25DA037756 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI FAIRBAIRN, NADIA · 2014 to 2023
$3.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA037756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2016, a public health emergency was declared in British Columbia due to an unprecedented number of illicit drug overdose deaths. Injection drug use was implicated in approximately one third of overdose deaths. An innovative delivery model using mobile supervised consumption services (SCS) was piloted in a rural health authority in BC with the goals of preventing overdose deaths, reducing public drug use, and connecting clients to health services.

methodsTwo mobile SCS created from retrofitted recreational vehicles were used to serve the populations of two mid-sized cities: Kelowna and Kamloops. Service utilization was tracked, and surveys and interviews were completed to capture clients', service providers', and community stakeholders' attitudes towards the mobile SCS.

resultsOver 90% of surveyed clients reported positive experiences in terms of access to services and physical safety of the mobile SCS. However, hours of operation met the needs of less than half of clients. Service providers were generally dissatisfied with the size of the space on the mobile SCS, noting constraints in the ability to respond to overdose events and meaningfully engage with clients in private conversations. Additional challenges included frequent operational interruptions as well as poor temperature control inside the mobile units. Winter weather conditions resulted in cancelled shifts and disrupted services. Among community members, there was variable support of the mobile SCS.

conclusionsOverall, the mobile SCS were a viable alternative to a permanent site but presented many challenges that undermined the continuity and quality of the service. A mobile site may be best suited to temporarily provide services while bridging towards a permanent location. A needs assessment should guide the stop locations, hours of operation, and scope of services provided. Finally, the importance of community engagement for successful implementation should not be overlooked.

Indexed as

AdultBritish ColumbiaDelivery of Health CareDrug OverdoseFemaleHarm ReductionHumansIllicit DrugsMaleMobile Health UnitsNeedle-Exchange ProgramsOpioid-Related DisordersRural Health ServicesRural PopulationWeatherYoung AdultIllicit DrugsHarm reductionInjection drug useMobile supervised consumption servicesOverdose

Identifiers

PMID30634986
PMCPMC6330429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.