Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30634942›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2019

Safety and efficacy of afatinib as add-on to standard therapy of gemcitabine/cisplatin in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: an open-label, phase I trial with an extensive biomarker program.

Markus Moehler, Annett Maderer, Anne Ehrlich, Friedrich Foerster, Arno Schad, Tanja Nickolay, Christian Ruckes, Arndt Weinmann, Visvakanth Sivanathan, Jens U Marquardt and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01679405 (Open-label, Uncontrolled, Multicenter Phase I/Ib Trial to Investigate Safety and Efficacy of BIBW 2992 and Standard Gemcitabine/Cisplatin in Chemo-naïve Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Adenocarcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01679405 phase1terminatednot on this map

Open-label, Uncontrolled, Multicenter Phase I/Ib Trial to Investigate Safety and Efficacy of BIBW 2992 and Standard Gemcitabine/Cisplatin in Chemo-naïve Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Adenocarcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohannes Gutenberg University MainzRan2012 to 2016Enrolled9ConditionsMetastatic DiseaseArmsBIBW 2992
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Combination Therapies for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Markus MoehlerI. Medical Department, Johannes-Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany. moehler@mail.uni-mainz.de.
Annett MadererI. Medical Department, Johannes-Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Anne EhrlichInterdisciplinary Center for Clinical Trials, Johannes-Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Friedrich FoersterI. Medical Department, Johannes-Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Arno SchadDepartment of Pathology, Johannes-Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Tanja NickolayInterdisciplinary Center for Clinical Trials, Johannes-Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Christian RuckesInterdisciplinary Center for Clinical Trials, Johannes-Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Arndt WeinmannI. Medical Department, Johannes-Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Visvakanth SivanathanI. Medical Department, Johannes-Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Jens U MarquardtI. Medical Department, Johannes-Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Peter Robert GalleI. Medical Department, Johannes-Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Marcus WoernsI. Medical Department, Johannes-Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Thomas ThomaidisI. Medical Department, Johannes-Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7829-7965
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo date, the cornerstone of treatment in patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is systemic chemotherapy based on a combination of gemcitabine and a platinum derivative. Other therapeutic approaches including targeted agents and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have demonstrated disappointing results, highlighting the complexity of CCA. Recently, drugs aiming at the inhibition of HER-receptors have shown first therapeutic benefit in patients with late stage disease. The aim of this phase I study was to test the dose level toxicities (DLTs), safety and efficacy of afatinib, a highly specific panErbB family receptor TKI, in chemotherapy naive patients with advanced CCA in conjunction with an extensive biomarker program.

methodsAfatinib was administered continuously p. o. as add-on in patients with advanced CCA who received conventional chemotherapy with gemcitabine/cisplatin. A classical 3 + 3 phase I study was employed, while the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of oral afatinib was determined in a 2 step dose escalation. Safety, overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were evaluated for all patients. Finally, a translational biomarker analysis was conducted for the EGFR and VEGF signalling cascades.

resultsOverall, 9 patients were enrolled. Further recruitment was discontinued due to lack of efficacy results of the tested drug in other indications. 30 mg afatinib could be safely administered as add-on to 80% of standard dose gemcitabine/cisplatin. The mOS and mPFS were 7.7 and 6.0 months, respectively. Diarrhoea and haematological disorders were the most common observed AEs. Almost all patients overexpressed EGFR on their tumour tissues, whereas none of them expressed mutations in Exons 18, 19 and 21. Non-responders showed a higher variation of VEGF-C, -D, leptin and sEGFR in their sera.

conclusionsAfatinib failed to show survival benefits in combination with gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with advanced CCA. Mutational analysis of EGFR and pathways associated with VEGF-C, -D and leptin might show promising results in future studies. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01679405 August, 2012.

Indexed as

AdultAfatinibAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiliary Tract NeoplasmsBiomarkersCisplatinDeoxycytidineErbB ReceptorsFemaleGemcitabineHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedAfatinibBiomarkersCisplatinDeoxycytidineEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsGemcitabineAfatinibBIBW 2992BiomarkersCholangiocarcinomaEGFRpanHER inhibition

Identifiers

PMID30634942
PMCPMC6330479
OpenAlexW2920758868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.