ArticleProteomes2019
Analysis of the Bacterial and Host Proteins along and across the Porcine Gastrointestinal Tract.
Article in Proteomes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proteomic Identification and Quantification of Basal Endogenous Proteins in the Ileal Digesta of Growing Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Integrated Proteomics Analysis of Baseline Protein Expression in Pig Tissues.Journal of proteome research · 2024Article
- Extraction of Proteins from Microbiome of Livestocks.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Metaproteomic Analysis of Gut Resistome in the Cecal Microbiota of Fattening Pigs Raised without Antibiotics.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Dietary Inclusion of Dried Chicory Root Affects Cecal Mucosa Proteome of Nursery Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Progress in Alternative Strategies to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance: Focus on Antibiotics.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Factors Influencing Proteolysis and Protein Utilization in the Intestine of Pigs: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Review
- Influenza A H1N1 Induced Disturbance of the Respiratory and Fecal Microbiome of German Landrace Pigs - a Multi-Omics Characterization.Microbiology spectrum · 2021Article
- Impact of Intestinal Microbiota on Growth and Feed Efficiency in Pigs: A Review.Microorganisms · 2020Review
- A Multi-Omics Protocol for Swine Feces to Elucidate Longitudinal Dynamics in Microbiome Structure and Function.Microorganisms · 2020Article
- Effect of very low-protein diets supplemented with branched-chain amino acids on energy balance, plasma metabolomics and fecal microbiome of pigs.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance in Veterinary Medicine: An Overview.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Scent of a Killer: Microbial Volatilome and Its Role in the Biological Control of Plant Pathogens.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Review
- DietaryJournal of animal science and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Neonatal Diet Impacts Bioregional Microbiota Composition in Piglets Fed Human Breast Milk or Infant Formula.The Journal of nutrition · 2019Article
- Editorial for Special Issue: Metaproteomics.Proteomes · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Pigs are among the most important farm animals worldwide and research to optimize their feed efficiency and improve their welfare is still in progress. The porcine intestinal microbiome is so far mainly known from sequencing-based studies. Digesta and mucosa samples from five different porcine gastrointestinal tract sections were analyzed by metaproteomics to obtain a deeper insight into the functions of bacterial groups with concomitant analyses of host proteins. Firmicutes (Prevotellaceae) dominated mucosa and digesta samples, followed by Bacteroidetes. Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria were much higher in abundance in mucosa compared to digesta samples. Functional profiling reveals the presence of core functions shared between digesta and mucosa samples. Protein abundances of energy production and conversion were higher in mucosa samples, whereas in digesta samples more proteins were involved in lipid transport and metabolism; short-chain fatty acids production were detected. Differences were also highlighted between sections, with the small intestine appearing more involved in carbohydrate transport and metabolism than the large intestine. Thus, this study produced the first functional analyses of the porcine GIT biology, discussing the findings in relation to expected bacterial and host functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.