ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2019
Monitoring of Nonadiabatic Effects in Individual Chromophores by Femtosecond Double-Pump Single-Molecule Spectroscopy: A Model Study.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Comprehensive Approach to Exciton Delocalization and Energy Transfer.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We explore, by theoretical modeling and computer simulations, how nonadiabatic couplings of excited electronic states of a polyatomic chromophore manifest themselves in single-molecule signals on femtosecond timescales. The chromophore is modeled as a system with three electronic states (the ground state and two non-adiabatically coupled excited states) and a Condon-active vibrational mode which, in turn, is coupled to a harmonic oscillator heat bath. For this system, we simulate double-pump single-molecule signals with fluorescence detection for different system-field interaction strengths, from the weak-coupling regime to the strong-coupling regime. While the signals are determined by the coherence of the electronic density matrix in the weak-coupling regime, they are determined by the populations of the electronic density matrix in the strong-coupling regime. As a consequence, the signals in the strong coupling regime allow the monitoring of nonadiabatic electronic population dynamics and are robust with respect to temporal inhomogeneity of the optical gap, while signals in the weak-coupling regime are sensitive to fluctuations of the optical gap and do not contain information on the electronic population dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.