Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30634526›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Aptamer Efficacies for In Vitro and In Vivo Modulation of αC-Conotoxin PrXA Pharmacology.

Germain Sotoing Taiwe, Jérôme Montnach, Sébastien Nicolas, Stéphan De Waard, Emmanuelle Fiore, Eric Peyrin, Tarek Mohamed Abd El-Aziz, Muriel Amar, Jordi Molgó, Michel Ronjat and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Value of Aptamers in Envenomation Cases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Germain Sotoing TaiweINSERM UMR 1087/CNRS UMR 6291, Institut du Thorax, Nouvelle Université à Nantes, LabEx Ion Channels, Science and Therapeutics, 8 Quai Moncousu, BP 70721 Nantes CEDEX 1, France. taiwe_sotoing@yahoo.fr.
Jérôme MontnachINSERM UMR 1087/CNRS UMR 6291, Institut du Thorax, Nouvelle Université à Nantes, LabEx Ion Channels, Science and Therapeutics, 8 Quai Moncousu, BP 70721 Nantes CEDEX 1, France. jerome.montnach@univ-nantes.fr.
Sébastien NicolasINSERM UMR 1087/CNRS UMR 6291, Institut du Thorax, Nouvelle Université à Nantes, LabEx Ion Channels, Science and Therapeutics, 8 Quai Moncousu, BP 70721 Nantes CEDEX 1, France. sebastien.nicolas@univ-nantes.fr.
Stéphan De WaardINSERM UMR 1087/CNRS UMR 6291, Institut du Thorax, Nouvelle Université à Nantes, LabEx Ion Channels, Science and Therapeutics, 8 Quai Moncousu, BP 70721 Nantes CEDEX 1, France. stephan.dewaard@univ-nantes.fr.
Emmanuelle FioreCNRS, DPM UMR 5063, University Grenoble Alpes, 38041 Grenoble, France. emmanuelle.fiore@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr.
Eric PeyrinCNRS, DPM UMR 5063, University Grenoble Alpes, 38041 Grenoble, France. eric.peyrin@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-5558-6369
Tarek Mohamed Abd El-AzizZoology Department, Faculty of Science, Minia University, 61519 El-Minia, Egypt. tarek.mohamed@mu.edu.eg.ORCID 0000-0002-3441-9673
Muriel AmarService d'Ingénierie Moléculaire des Protéines, Institut des Sciences du Vivant Frédéric Joliot, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91191 Gif sur Yvette, France. muriel.amar@cea.fr.
Jordi MolgóService d'Ingénierie Moléculaire des Protéines, Institut des Sciences du Vivant Frédéric Joliot, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91191 Gif sur Yvette, France. jordi.molgo@cea.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-0693-8994
Michel RonjatINSERM UMR 1087/CNRS UMR 6291, Institut du Thorax, Nouvelle Université à Nantes, LabEx Ion Channels, Science and Therapeutics, 8 Quai Moncousu, BP 70721 Nantes CEDEX 1, France. michel.ronjat@univ-nantes.fr.
Denis ServentService d'Ingénierie Moléculaire des Protéines, Institut des Sciences du Vivant Frédéric Joliot, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91191 Gif sur Yvette, France. denis.servent@cea.fr.
Corinne RaveletCNRS, DPM UMR 5063, University Grenoble Alpes, 38041 Grenoble, France. corinne.ravelet@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr.
Michel De WaardINSERM UMR 1087/CNRS UMR 6291, Institut du Thorax, Nouvelle Université à Nantes, LabEx Ion Channels, Science and Therapeutics, 8 Quai Moncousu, BP 70721 Nantes CEDEX 1, France. michel.dewaard@univ-nantes.fr.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Paris-Saclay · FRMinia University · EGUniversité Paris-Sud · FR

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-11-LABX-0015Fondation Leducq ERPT equipment
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The medical staff is often powerless to treat patients affected by drug abuse or misuse and poisoning. In the case of envenomation, the treatment of choice remains horse sera administration that poses a wealth of other medical conditions and threats. Previously, we have demonstrated that DNA-based aptamers represent powerful neutralizing tools for lethal animal toxins of venomous origin. Herein, we further pursued our investigations in order to understand whether all toxin-interacting aptamers possessed equivalent potencies to neutralize αC-conotoxin PrXA in vitro and in vivo. We confirmed the high lethality in mice produced by αC-conotoxin PrXA regardless of the mode of injection and further characterized myoclonus produced by the toxin. We used high-throughput patch-clamp technology to assess the effect of αC-conotoxin PrXA on ACh-mediated responses in TE671 cells, responses that are carried by muscle-type nicotinic receptors. We show that 2 out of 4 aptamers reduce the affinity of the toxin for its receptor, most likely by interfering with the pharmacophore. In vivo, more complex responses on myoclonus and mice lethality are observed depending on the type of aptamer and mode of administration (concomitant or differed). Concomitant administration always works better than differed administration indicating the stability of the complex in vivo. The most remarkable conclusion is that an aptamer that has no or a limited efficacy in vitro may nevertheless be functional in vivo probably owing to an impact on the biodistribution or pharmacokinetics of the toxin in vivo. Overall, the results highlight that a blind selection of aptamers against toxins leads to efficient neutralizing compounds in vivo regardless of the mode of action. This opens the door to the use of aptamer mixtures as substitutes to horse sera for the neutralization of life-threatening animal venoms, an important WHO concern in tropical areas.

Indexed as

AnimalsAptamers, NucleotideCell LineConotoxinsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleMaleMiceMyoclonusReceptors, NicotinicSELEX Aptamer TechniquealphaC-conotoxin PrXAAptamers, NucleotideConotoxinsReceptors, Nicotiniccone peptideDNA aptameroligonucleotidetoxin neutralizationvenomαC-conotoxin PrXA

Identifiers

PMID30634526
PMCPMC6359527
OpenAlexW2910294666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.