Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30634036›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials2019

Blood pressure checks and diagnosing hypertension (BP-CHECK): Design and methods of a randomized controlled diagnostic study comparing clinic, home, kiosk, and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring.

Beverly B Green, Melissa L Anderson, Jerry Campbell, Andrea J Cook, Kelly Ehrlich, Sarah Evers, Yoshio N Hall, Clarissa Hsu, Dwayne Joseph, Predrag Klasnja and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Beverly B GreenKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, United States; Kaiser Permanente Washington Medical Group, United States. Electronic address: Bev.B.Green@kp.org.
Melissa L AndersonKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, United States.
Jerry CampbellKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, United States.
Andrea J CookKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, United States.
Kelly EhrlichKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, United States.
Sarah EversKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, United States.
Yoshio N HallKidney Research Institute, University of Washington Department of Medicine, United States.
Clarissa HsuKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, United States.
Dwayne JosephKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, United States.
Predrag KlasnjaKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, United States.
Karen L MargolisHealthPartners Institute, United States.
Jennifer B McClureKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, United States.
Sean A MunsonUniversity of Washington, Department of Human Centered Design and Engineering, United States.
Mathew J ThompsonUniversity of Washington, Department of Family Medicine, United States.
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USUniversity of Washington · USHealthPartners · US

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute CER-1511-32979
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe US Preventive Services Task Force recommends out-of-office blood pressure (BPs) before making a new diagnosis of hypertension, using 24-h ambulatory (ABPM) or home BP monitoring (HBPM), however this is not common in routine clinical practice. Blood Pressure Checks and Diagnosing Hypertension (BP-CHECK) is a randomized controlled diagnostic study assessing the comparability and acceptability of clinic, home, and kiosk-based BP monitoring to ABPM for diagnosing hypertension. Stakeholders including patients, providers, policy makers, and researchers informed the study design and protocols.

methodsAdults aged 18-85 without diagnosed hypertension and on no hypertension medication with elevated BPs in clinic and at the baseline research visit are randomized to one of 3 regimens for diagnosing hypertension: (1) clinic BPs, (2) home BPs, or (3) kiosk BPs; all participants subsequently complete ABPM. The primary outcomes are the comparability (with daytime ABPM mean systolic and diastolic BP as the reference standard) and acceptability (e.g., adherence to, patient-reported outcomes) of each method compared to ABPM. Longer-term outcomes are assessed at 6-months including: patient-reported outcomes, primary care providers' diagnosis of hypertension; and BP control. We report challenges experienced and our response to these.

resultsEnrollment began in May of 2017 with a target of randomizing 510 participants. BP thresholds for diagnosing hypertension in the US changed after the trial started. We discuss the stakeholder process used to assess and respond to these changes. CONCLUSION AND PUBLIC HEALTH IMPACT: BP-CHECK will inform which hypertension diagnostic methods are most accurate, acceptable, and feasible to implement in primary care.

Indexed as

Blood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationHypertensionAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory Care FacilitiesBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryCommunity Pharmacy ServicesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignBlood pressureBlood pressure monitoringHypertensionPatient reported outcomesPrimary careRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID30634036
PMCPMC7067555
OpenAlexW2909729554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.