Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30633830›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2019

Separate cortical and hippocampal cell populations target the rat nucleus reuniens and mammillary bodies.

Mathias L Mathiasen, Eman Amin, Andrew J D Nelson, Christopher M Dillingham, Shane M O'Mara, John P Aggleton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Dorsal-Caudal and Ventral Hippocampi Target Different Cell Populations in the Medial Frontal Cortex in Rodents.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Time to put the mammillothalamic pathway into context.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Anatomical Boundary of the Rat Claustrum.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mathias L MathiasenSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Wales, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0821-6626
Eman AminSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Wales, UK.
Andrew J D NelsonSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Wales, UK.
Christopher M DillinghamInstitute of Neuroscience, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Shane M O'MaraInstitute of Neuroscience, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
John P AggletonSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Wales, UK.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust #103722/Z14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleus reuniens receives dense projections from both the hippocampus and the frontal cortices. Reflecting these connections, this nucleus is thought to enable executive functions, including those involving spatial learning. The mammillary bodies, which also support spatial learning, again receive dense hippocampal inputs, as well as lighter projections from medial frontal areas. The present study, therefore, compared the sources of these inputs to nucleus reuniens and the mammillary bodies. Retrograde tracer injections in rats showed how these two diencephalic sites receive projections from separate cell populations, often from adjacent layers in the same cortical areas. In the subiculum, which projects strongly to both sites, the mammillary body inputs originate from a homogenous pyramidal cell population in more superficial levels, while the cells that target nucleus reuniens most often originate from cells positioned at a deeper level. In these deeper levels, a more morphologically diverse set of subiculum cells contributes to the thalamic projection, especially at septal levels. While both diencephalic sites also receive medial frontal inputs, those to nucleus reuniens are especially dense. The densest inputs to the mammillary bodies appear to arise from the dorsal peduncular cortex, where the cells are mostly separate from deeper neurons that project to nucleus reuniens. Again, in those other cortical regions that innervate both nucleus reuniens and the mammillary bodies, there was no evidence of collateral projections. The findings support the notion that these diencephalic nuclei represent components of distinct, but complementary, systems that support different aspects of cognition.

Indexed as

AnimalsCerebral CortexMaleMammillary BodiesMidline Thalamic NucleiNeuroanatomical Tract-Tracing TechniquesNeuronsRatsanatomyfrontal cortexhippocampussubiculumthalamus

Identifiers

PMID30633830
PMCPMC6618334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.