Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30633429›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2019

Connectome-based model predicts individual differences in propensity to trust.

Xiaping Lu, Ting Li, Zhichao Xia, Ruida Zhu, Li Wang, Yue-Jia Luo, Chunliang Feng, Frank Krueger

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neurocomputational Substrates Underlying the Effect of Identifiability on Third-Party Punishment.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Xiaping LuCenter for Brain Disorders and Cognitive Sciences, Shenzhen Univeristy, Shenzhen, China.
Ting LiCollaborative Innovation Center of Assessment toward Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Zhichao XiaState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Ruida ZhuState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Li WangCollaborative Innovation Center of Assessment toward Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Yue-Jia LuoCenter for Brain Disorders and Cognitive Sciences, Shenzhen Univeristy, Shenzhen, China.
Chunliang FengCenter for Brain Disorders and Cognitive Sciences, Shenzhen Univeristy, Shenzhen, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5595-2146
Frank KruegerSchool of Systems Biology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia.
Beijing Normal University · CNGeorge Mason University · USKunming University of Science and Technology · CNThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2017M610055National Natural Science Foundation of China 31530031National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents BX201600019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trust constitutes a fundamental basis of human society and plays a pivotal role in almost every aspect of human relationships. Although enormous interest exists in determining the neuropsychological underpinnings of a person's propensity to trust utilizing task-based fMRI; however, little progress has been made in predicting its variations by task-free fMRI based on whole-brain resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC). Here, we combined a one-shot trust game with a connectome-based predictive modeling approach to predict propensity to trust from whole-brain RSFC. We demonstrated that individual variations in the propensity to trust were primarily predicted by RSFC rooted in the functional integration of distributed key nodes-caudate, amygdala, lateral prefrontal cortex, temporal-parietal junction, and the temporal pole-which are part of domain-general large-scale networks essential for the motivational, affective, and cognitive aspects of trust. We showed, further, that the identified brain-behavior associations were only evident for trust but not altruistic preferences and that propensity to trust (and its underlying neural underpinnings) were modulated according to the extent to which a person emphasizes general social preferences (i.e., horizontal collectivism) rather than general risk preferences (i.e., trait impulsiveness). In conclusion, the employed data-driven approach enables to predict propensity to trust from RSFC and highlights its potential use as an objective neuromarker of trust impairment in mental disorders.

Indexed as

ConnectomeIndividualityTrustAdolescentAdultBrainFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung Adultconnectome-based predictive modelingindividual differenceresting-state functional connectivitysocial decision makingtrust

Identifiers

PMID30633429
PMCPMC6865671
OpenAlexW2909116507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.