ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2019
Creating highly efficient resistance against wheat dwarf virus in barley by employing CRISPR/Cas9 system.
Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of CRISPR/Cas9 based single and multiplex gRNAs against ChiLCV in tobacco.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Advances in CRISPR Plant Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Genome editing‑based strategies to combat geminiviruses: CRISPR/Cas9 and emerging high‑fidelity tools.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Geminiviral-CR-gRNA expressed in cowpea efficiently edited MYMV and MYMIV genome to provide resistance against cowpea yellow mosaic disease without hampering plant growth and yield.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- CRISPR-Cas technologies for precision genome editing in plants: advances, applications, and future perspectives.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Strategies for plant-virus disease management from gene editing to nanotechnology.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025Review
- Review
- Artificial miRNAs and target-mimics as potential tools for crop improvement.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025Review
- Efficient gene editing of a model fern species through gametophyte-based transformation.Plant physiology · 2024Article
- CRISPR/Cas: An Emerging Toolbox for Engineering Virus Resistance in Plants.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- Review
- Advancing crop disease resistance through genome editing: a promising approach for enhancing agricultural production.Frontiers in genome editing · 2024Review
- Application of CRISPR/Cas-based gene-editing for developing better banana.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- CRISPR/Cas9-gene editing approaches in plant breeding.GM crops & food · 2023Review
- CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in wheat: enhancing quality and productivity for global food security-a review.Functional & integrative genomics · 2023Review
- Recent Developments in CRISPR/Cas9 Genome-Editing Technology Related to Plant Disease Resistance and Abiotic Stress Tolerance.Biology · 2023Review
- Natural and Engineered Resistance Mechanisms in Plants against Phytoviruses.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Development of Highly Efficient Resistance toInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Genome editing for healthy crops: traits, tools and impacts.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.