Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30633405›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2019

HIDRAdisk: validation of an innovative visual tool to assess the burden of hidradenitis suppurativa.

K Peris, A Lo Schiavo, G Fabbrocini, V Dini, A Patrizi, M Fusano, L Bianchi, E Guanziroli, C Guarneri, A Parodi and 19 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Assessing unmet needs in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa.Archives of dermatological research · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Skin and Psychosomatics - Psychodermatology today.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

K PerisIstituto di Dermatologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
A Lo SchiavoUnità di Dermatologia, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
G FabbrociniU.O.C. di Dermatologia- Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia, Università di Napoli "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
V DiniU.O. Dermatologia, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
A PatriziDermatologia, DIMES (Dipartimento di Medicina clinica Specialistica e Sperimentale), Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
M FusanoASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, U.O. Dermatologia e Venereologia, Università di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
L BianchiUnità Operativa di Dermatologia, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Università degli studi di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
E GuanziroliDipartimento di Fisiopatologia, IRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
C GuarneriDipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Dentali e Imaging Morfofunzionale, Unità di Dermatologia, Università di Messina, Messina, Italy.
A ParodiDiSSal Sezione di Dermatologia, Università di Genova, Ospedale-Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
A BertoldiDipartimento di Dermatologia, Ospedale "Santi Giovanni e Paolo", Venice, Italy.
M L MusumeciDermatology Clinic, P.O. G. Rodolico, A.O.U. Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele, Catania, Italy.
A OffidaniSOD Clinica di Dermatologia, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Ancona, Italy.
F RongiolettiClinica Dermatologica, Dipartimento di scienze Mediche e Salute Pubblica, Università di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
G PistoneDipartimento Di.Bi. MIS, U.O.C. di Dermatologia e MTS, A.O.U.P "Paolo Giaccone", Palermo, Italy.
G MalaraStruttura Complessa presso la UOC di Dermatologia GOM "Bianchi Melacrino Morelli", Reggio Calabria, Italy.
C PotenzaFacoltà di Farmacia e Medicina, U.O.C. di Dermatologia "Daniele Innocenzi", Università degli Studi di Roma "Sapienza", Polo Pontino, Italy.
A CasariClinica Dermatologica, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy.
C FranchiUO dermatologia, IRCCS Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
M ArdigòU.O.C. di Dermatologia Clinica, IFO-San Gallicano, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
F CusanoU.O.C. di Dermatologia, A.O. Gaetano Rummo, Benevento, Italy.
L StingeniSezione di Dermatologia Clinica, Allergologica e Venereologica, Dipartimento di Medicina, Università di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
P AmerioDipartimento di Medicina e Scienze dell'Invecchiamento, Università G. d'Annunzio, Chieti, Italy.
L L ManciniUnità di Dermatologia, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
F PrignanoClinica Dermatologica - ASF Dipartimento di Chirurgia e Medicina Translazionale, Ospedale Piero Palagi, Università di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
T DeboliDermatologia, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
G GualbertiAbbVie s.r.l., Rome, Italy.
V SaragagliaAbbVie s.r.l., Rome, Italy.
V BettoliDipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Specialistica, U.O. di Dermatologia, A.O.U. di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
ABB (Italy) · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITAzienda ospedaliera "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli" · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITAzienda Ospedaliera G.Rummo · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "Paolo Giaccone" di Palermo · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico - Vittorio Emanuele · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITMarche Polytechnic University · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITOspedale San Paolo · ITPoliclinico di Modena · ITPoliclinico Tor Vergata · ITSan Gallicano Hospital · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Cagliari · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · IT

Funding

AbbVie
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, relapsing, inflammatory skin disease characterized by painful inflamed nodules, recurrent abscesses and fistulas located in apocrine gland-bearing body sites. The negative impact of HS on patient's quality of life (QoL) has been reported to be greater than other dermatologic conditions as psoriasis and atopic eczema, and its improvement is an important goal in disease management. Nowadays, there are no specific validated QoL instruments available for HS and generic dermatologic questionnaires are used.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to demonstrate the validity, reliability and responsiveness of HIDRAdisk, a new innovative tool designed for rapid assessment of HS burden and, at the same time, an intuitive graphic visualization of the measurement outcome.

methodsA multicentre, longitudinal, observational study was conducted to validate the HIDRAdisk compared with other validated questionnaires [Skindex-16, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-General Health (WPAI:GH)] and to evaluate its correlation with disease severity in Italian patients with any degree of HS severity, as measured by Hurley stage and HS Physician Global Assessment (HS-PGA).

resultsA total of 140 patients (59% women; mean age 34.9 ± 11.0 years) were enrolled in 27 dermatologic centres. HIDRAdisk showed a strong correlation with Skindex-16 and DLQI, and a good one with WPAI:GH (correlation coefficient: 0.7568, 0.6651 and 0.5947, respectively) and a statistically significant correlation with both Hurley stage and HS-PGA. Very good internal consistency (Cronbach coefficient >0.80; intraclass correlation coefficient >0.6), with correlation between the 10 items, good test-retest reliability (Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.8331; P < 0.0001) and responsiveness to changes were demonstrated.

conclusionOur study shows that HIDRAdisk, a short and innovative visual HS QoL instrument, has been psychometrically validated in Italian language and it may help improve the management of HS once implemented in routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

Hidradenitis SuppurativaQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultFemaleHumansItalyLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsVisual Analog ScaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30633405
PMCPMC6593467
OpenAlexW2908669769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.