Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30633180›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2019

Effects of theophylline therapy on respiratory muscle strength in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation: A retrospective cohort study.

Teng-Jen Yu, Yu-Chih Liu, Chien-Min Chu, Han-Chung Hu, Kuo-Chin Kao

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05947643 (Smell in COVID-19 and Efficacy of Nasal Theophylline 3), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05947643 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Smell in COVID-19 and Efficacy of Nasal Theophylline 3

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2022 to 2025Enrolled77ConditionsCOVID-19Armstheophylline, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Teng-Jen YuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung.
Yu-Chih LiuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung.
Chien-Min ChuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung.
Han-Chung HuDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital.
Kuo-Chin KaoDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital.
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWMemorial Hospital of South Bend · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation may cause diaphragm weakness an effect termed ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction (VIDD). The prevalence of VIDD among patients receiving mechanical ventilation is very high, with the degree of diaphragmatic atrophy being associated with the length of mechanical ventilation. Theophylline is known to increase diaphragmatic contractility and reduce fatigue, so in this study, we evaluated the effect of theophylline in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation.Patients who depended on mechanical ventilation were included in the study. We compared the maximum inspiratory pressure (PImax) values, rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) values, and successful weaning rates of theophylline-treated and non-theophylline-treated patients.Eighty-four patients received theophylline and 76 patients did not. These 2 groups' clinical characteristics, including their PImax and RSBI at initial admission, were similar. The results showed that the theophylline-treated group had significantly better PImax and RSBI, with a higher last PImax (30.1 ± 9.7 cmH2O vs 26.9 ± 9.1 cmH2O; P = .034) and lower last RSBI (107.0 ± 68.4 vs 131.4 ± 77.7; P = .036). The improvements to each respective patient's PImax and RSBI were also significantly higher in the theophylline-treated group (PImax: 20.1 ± 5.7% vs 3.2 ± 1.1%, P = .005; RSBI: 11.2 ± 3.0% vs 2.7 ± 1.6%, P = .015). The weaning success rate of the theophylline-treated group was also higher, but not significantly so.Theophylline might improve respiratory muscle strength in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation and it needs further prospective studies to confirm.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overDiaphragmHumansMiddle AgedMuscle ContractionMuscle StrengthRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory MusclesRetrospective StudiesTheophyllineVentilator WeaningTheophylline

Identifiers

PMID30633180
PMCPMC6336648
OpenAlexW2913026161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.