ArticleMedicine2019
Predictive models composed by radiomic features extracted from multi-detector computed tomography images for predicting low- and high- grade clear cell renal cell carcinoma: A STARD-compliant article.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- CT-based radiomics for differentiating renal tumours: a systematic review.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2021Pooled it
- Multiparameter computed tomography (CT) radiomics signature fusion-based model for the preoperative prediction of clear cell renal cell carcinoma nuclear grade: a multicenter development and external validation study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- A contrast-enhanced computed tomography-based radiomics nomogram for preoperative differentiation between benign and malignant cystic renal lesions.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Article
- CT-based radiomics model using stability selection for predicting the World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.The British journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Machine learning-based CT radiomics approach for predicting WHO/ISUP nuclear grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: an exploratory and comparative study.Insights into imaging · 2021Article
- Shape and texture-based radiomics signature on CT effectively discriminates benign from malignant renal masses.European radiology · 2021Article
- MDCT-Based Radiomics Features for the Differentiation of Serous Borderline Ovarian Tumors and Serous Malignant Ovarian Tumors.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
- Preoperative Predicting the WHO/ISUP Nuclear Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma by Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics Features.Journal of personalized medicine · 2020Article
- Prediction models for clear cell renal cell carcinoma ISUP/WHO grade: comparison between CT radiomics and conventional contrast-enhanced CT.The British journal of radiology · 2020Article
- Predicting the ISUP grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma with multiparametric MR and multiphase CT radiomics.European radiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the values of conventional image features (CIFs) and radiomic features (RFs) extracted from multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) images for predicting low- and high-grade clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).Two hundred twenty-seven patients with ccRCC were retrospectively recruited. Five hundred seventy features including 14 CIFs and 556 RFs were extracted from MDCT images of each ccRCC. The CIFs were extracted manually and RFs by the free software-MaZda. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) was applied to shrink the high-dimensional data set and select the features. Five predictive models for predicting low- and high-grade ccRCC were constructed by the selected CIFs and RFs. The 5 models were as follows: model of minimum mean squared error (minMSE) of CIFs (CIF-minMSE), minMSE of cortico-medullary phase (CMP) of kidney (CMP-minMSE), minMSE of parenchyma phase (PP) of kidney (PP-minMSE), the combined model of CIF-minMSE and CMP-minMSE (CIF-CMP-minMSE), and the combined model of CIF-minMSE and PP-minMSE (CIF-PP-minMSE). The Lasso regression equation of each model was constructed, and the predictive values were calculated. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of predictive values of the 5 models were drawn by SPSS19.0, and the areas under the curves (AUCs) were calculated.According to Lasso regression, 12, 19 and 10 features were respectively selected from the CIFs, RFs of CMP image and that of PP images to construct the 5 predictive models. The models ordered by their AUCs from large to small were CIF-CMP-minMSE (AUC: 0.986), CIF-PP-minMSE (AUC: 0.981), CIF-minMSE (AUC: 0.980), CMP-minMSE (AUC: 0.975), and PP-minMSE (AUC: 0.963). The maximum diameter of the largest axial section of ccRCC had a maximum weight in predicting the grade of ccRCC among all the features, and its cutoff value was 6.15 cm with a sensitivity of 0.901, a specificity of 0.963, and an AUC of 0.975.When combined with CIFs, RFs extracted from MDCT images contributed to the larger AUC of the predictive model, but were less valuable than CIFs when used alone. The CIF-CMP-minMSE was the optimal predictive model. The maximum diameter of the largest axial section of ccRCC had the largest weight in all features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.