Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30633064›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient safety2021

Assessment of Public Perception Regarding Patient Engagement for Patient Safety in Korea.

Hyeon-Jeong Lee, Seung Gyeong Jang, Ji Eun Choi, Won Lee, Jeehee Pyo, Minsu Ock, Sang-Il Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient safety, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The public's perceptions of patient safety in healthcare.Israel journal of health policy research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The effects of a mobile application for patient participation to improve patient safety.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hyeon-Jeong LeeFrom the Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine.
Seung Gyeong Jang
Ji Eun ChoiOffice of Research Planning and Coordination Department, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency.
Won LeeDivision of Medical Law and Bioethics, Department of Medical Humanities and Social Sciences, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul.
Jeehee PyoDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Minsu OckDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Il LeeFrom the Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study conducted a survey to examine how the general public in Korea perceives patient engagement for patient safety and to identify vulnerable groups and contents priorities of patient engagement education for the general public.

methodsWe developed a questionnaire based on previous studies and conducted one-on-one interviews with 600 individuals from the public. Then, we conducted descriptive statistical analyses (i.e., frequency, percentage, and averages) on the questionnaire items. Furthermore, we examined the individual differences of participants' sociodemographic characteristics in their responses to the questionnaire.

resultsThe general public's awareness regarding accreditation programs for healthcare organizations was still low (47.4%). Nearly 60% of participants said that they did not agree with the practice of telling their own names and dates of birth before treatment. Approximately 80% of the participants would not ask medical staff to confirm washing their hands. Only half of the participants were aware of medical dispute mediation and arbitration programs. Nearly 90% of the participants agreed that patient safety is important. However, on participants' confidence in making the correct choice and safety in their treatment, the average score was 68.7 of 100 points. Participants tended to be less confident about engaging in patient safety activities if they were older, less educated, or had poor health status.

conclusionsParticipants in this study believed that patient safety is an important issue, but they were not confident about choosing the correct medical institution or about receiving safe treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerPatient ParticipationPatient SafetyRepublic of KoreaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30633064
PMCPMC7781086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.