ArticleJMIR medical informatics2019
Improving Digital Hospital Transformation: Development of an Outcomes-Based Infrastructure Maturity Assessment Framework.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Developing the Digital Health Communication Maturity Model: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Synthesizing Dimensions of Digital Maturity in Hospitals: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Pooled it
- Digital Quality Monitoring for Type 2 Diabetes in Swiss Primary Care: Qualitative Interview Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Workplace telepressure and workplace cognitive failure among hospital financial personnel: a mediation analysis and latent profile analysis based on work-family conflict and self-regulatory fatigue.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Transition Toward Smart Hospitals: A Scoping Review of Features, Technologies, and Challenges.Health science reports · 2025Review
- A methodological design and an empirical study for assessing the maturity of an UASR based on the AHP-EWM and the FSEM fusion model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Big 5 Personality Traits and Individual- and Practice-Related Characteristics as Influencing Factors of Digital Maturity in General Practices: Quantitative Web-Based Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Review
- Assessing the Carbon Footprint of Telemedicine: A Systematic Review.Health services insights · 2024Review
- Personal Health Record (PHR) Experience and Recommendations for a Transformation in Saudi Arabia.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- The Impact of Digital Transformation on Inpatient Care: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2023Review
- Digital health and capability maturity models-a critical thematic review and conceptual synthesis of the literature.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Review
- A Sense of Coherence Approach to Improving Patient Experience Using Information Infrastructure Modeling: Design Science Research.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Digital maturity and its determinants in General Practice: A cross-sectional study in 20 countries.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Cross-site transportability of an explainable artificial intelligence model for acute kidney injury prediction.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Current State and Strategy for Establishing a Digitally Innovative Hospital: Memorial Review Article for Opening of Yongin Severance Hospital.Yonsei medical journal · 2020Review
- Digital Health Transformation of Integrated Care in Europe: Overarching Analysis of 17 Integrated Care Programs.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDigital transformation in health care is being driven by the need to improve quality, reduce costs, and enhance the patient experience of health care delivery. It does this through both the direct intervention of technology to create new diagnostic and treatment opportunities and also through the improved use of information to create more engaging and efficient care processes.
objectiveIn a modern digital hospital, improved clinical and business processes are often driven through enhancing the information flows that support them. To understand an organization's ability to transform their information flows requires a clear understanding of the capabilities of an organization's information technology infrastructure. To date, hospital facilities have been challenged by the absence of uniform ways of describing this infrastructure that would enable them to benchmark where they are and create a vision of where they would like to be. While there is an industry assessment measure for electronic medical record (EMR) adoption using the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society Analytics EMR Adoption Model, there is no equivalent for assessing the infrastructure and associated technology capabilities for digital hospitals. Our aim is to fill this gap, as hospital administrators and clinicians need to know how and why to invest in information infrastructure to support health information technology that benefits patient safety and care.
methodsBased on an operational framework for the Capability Maturity Model, devised specifically for health care, we applied information use characteristics to define eight information systems maturity levels and associated technology infrastructure capabilities. These levels are mapped to user experiences to create a linkage between technology infrastructure and experience outcomes. Subsequently, specific technology capabilities are deconstructed to identify the technology features required to meet each maturity level.
resultsThe resulting assessment framework clearly defines 164 individual capabilities across the five technology domains and eight maturity levels for hospital infrastructure. These level-dependent capabilities characterize the ability of the hospital's information infrastructure to support the business of digital hospitals including clinical and administrative requirements. Further, it allows the addition of a scoring calculation for each capability, domain, and the overall infrastructure, and it identifies critical requirements to meet each of the maturity levels.
conclusionsThis new Infrastructure Maturity Assessment framework will allow digital hospitals to assess the maturity of their infrastructure in terms of their digital transformation aligning to business outcomes and supporting the desired level of clinical and operational competency. It provides the ability to establish an international benchmark of hospital infrastructure performance, while identifying weaknesses in current infrastructure capability. Further, it provides a business case justification through increased functionality and a roadmap for subsequent digital transformation while moving from one maturity level to the next. As such, this framework will encourage and guide information-driven, digital transformation in health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.