Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30632769›Full record

ArticleAIDS patient care and STDs2019

Awareness and Interest in HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Among Street-Based Female Sex Workers: Results from a US Context.

Catherine Tomko, Ju Nyeong Park, Sean T Allen, Jennifer Glick, Noya Galai, Michele R Decker, Katherine H A Footer, Susan G Sherman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS patient care and STDs, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. "Protected Means Armed": Perspectives on Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Among Women Who Engage in Sex Work and Use Drugs in Kazakhstan.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Potential Role of Conversational Agents in Encouraging PrEP Uptake.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Catherine Tomko1 Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ju Nyeong Park1 Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Sean T Allen1 Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jennifer Glick1 Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Noya Galai2 Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Michele R Decker3 Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Katherine H A Footer4 Center for Public Health and Human Rights, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Susan G Sherman1 Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

Vaccine Response and Immunotherapeutics SWGP30AI094189 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Richard E. Chaisson · 2012 to 2026
$67.0M
The HIV risk environment of high-risk women: Interaction with public safetyR01DA038499 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SHERMAN, SUSAN G. · 2015 to 2018
$2.8M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI094189NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA038499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has the potential to be an empowering HIV prevention tool among female sex workers (FSW), yet little is known about PrEP awareness and interest in this population. Sex workers and Police Promoting Health in Risky Environments (SAPPHIRE) is a prospective cohort study of street-based FSW in Baltimore, MD. A cross-sectional analysis explored awareness and interest in PrEP among HIV-negative FSW. Multivariable Poisson regressions modeled associations between individual, interpersonal, and structural variables and PrEP awareness and interest. Of n = 232 FSW, 66% were white, half were less than 35 years old, 59% injected drugs daily, and 66% sold sex daily. Only 21% of FSW were aware of PrEP, though 74% were interested. PrEP awareness was associated with experiencing client condom coercion [adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.28-0.90] and condomless sex with an intimate partner (aIRR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.30-0.98). PrEP interest was associated with perceiving PrEP as "very easy" to take (aIRR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.49-2.45) and moving to an unfamiliar geographic area to sell sex (aIRR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.04-1.39). Women who had a current gonorrhea or chlamydia infection were less likely to be interested in PrEP (aIRR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.59-0.95). Though PrEP awareness among FSW is low, there are FSW who are significantly more likely to express interest in PrEP and outreach efforts should target these women. Results suggest that women-controlled HIV prevention methods may be important for reducing incidence among FSW.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAnti-HIV AgentsBaltimoreCondomsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHIV SeronegativityHumansInterpersonal RelationsIntimate Partner ViolencePatient Acceptance of Health CarePre-Exposure ProphylaxisProspective StudiesSexual PartnersAnti-HIV AgentsawarenessHIVpre-exposure prophylaxispreventionsex work

Identifiers

PMID30632769
PMCPMC6386071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.