Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30632465›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2019

Impact of Hydrogel Stiffness on Differentiation of Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cell Microspheroids.

Sara Žigon-Branc, Marica Markovic, Jasper Van Hoorick, Sandra Van Vlierberghe, Peter Dubruel, Elise Zerobin, Stefan Baudis, Aleksandr Ovsianikov

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Sara Žigon-BrancInstitute of Materials Science and Technology, Technische Universität Wien (TU Wien), Vienna, Austria.
Marica MarkovicInstitute of Materials Science and Technology, Technische Universität Wien (TU Wien), Vienna, Austria.
Jasper Van HoorickDepartment of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry, Polymer Chemistry and Biomaterials Group, Centre of Macromolecular Chemistry, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Sandra Van VlierbergheDepartment of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry, Polymer Chemistry and Biomaterials Group, Centre of Macromolecular Chemistry, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Peter DubruelDepartment of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry, Polymer Chemistry and Biomaterials Group, Centre of Macromolecular Chemistry, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Elise ZerobinAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Austria.
Stefan BaudisAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Austria.
Aleksandr OvsianikovInstitute of Materials Science and Technology, Technische Universität Wien (TU Wien), Vienna, Austria.
TU Wien · ATAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration · ATFlanders Make (Belgium) · BEInstitute of Macromolecular Chemistry · UAVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrogels represent an attractive material platform for realization of three-dimensional (3D) tissue-engineered constructs, as they have tunable mechanical properties, are compatible with different types of cells, and resemble elements found in natural extracellular matrices. So far, numerous hydrogel-cartilage/bone tissue engineering (TE)-related studies were performed by utilizing a single cell encapsulation approach. Although multicellular spheroid cultures exhibit advantageous properties for cartilage or bone TE, the chondrogenic or osteogenic differentiation potential of stem cell microspheroids within hydrogels has not been investigated much. This study explores, for the first time, how stiffness of gelatin-based hydrogels (having a storage modulus of 538, 3584, or 7263 Pa) affects proliferation and differentiation of microspheroids formed from telomerase-immortalized human adipose-derived stem cells (hASC/hTERT). Confocal microscopy indicates that all tested hydrogels supported cell viability during their 3- to 5-week culture period in the control, chondrogenic, or osteogenic medium. Although in the softer hydrogels cells from neighboring microspheroids started outgrowing and interconnecting within a few days, their protrusion was slower or limited in stiffer hydrogels or those cultured in chondrogenic medium, respectively. High expressions of chondrogenic markers (

Indexed as

Adipose TissueCalciumCell DifferentiationCell ShapeCells, ImmobilizedCell SurvivalChondrogenesisElastic ModulusGene Expression RegulationGlycosaminoglycansHumansHydrogelsRheologySpheroids, CellularStem CellsCalciumGlycosaminoglycansHydrogelsadult stem cellsbonecartilagecell differentiationcell encapsulationhydrogels

Identifiers

PMID30632465
PMCPMC6784494
OpenAlexW2909394322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.