Trial reportPhysiological reports2019
One-minute heart rate variability - an adjunct for airway obstruction identification.
Trial report in Physiological reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- One-minute heart rate variability - an adjunct for airway obstruction identification.Physiological reports · 2019Trial
- Different Impact of Heart Rate Variability in the Deep Cerebral and Central Hemodynamics at Rest: AnFrontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- When the inner clock fades: Interoceptive decline and consolidation of phase resetting in cortical rhythms by cardiac events underlie healthy lifespan aging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart rate variability (HRV) reflects cardiac and autonomic nervous system activity. It is usually measured over a relatively prolonged period and presented using multiple parameters. Here, we studied rapid HRV changes during airway obstruction using a short (1 min) sampling window. Forty healthy volunteers underwent a trial of obstructed breathing. Heart rate was recorded during three consecutive sets comprised of 1-min control followed by 1 min of obstructed breathing, with 1 min of rest between sets. Time and frequency domain analysis were used to compare HRV during control versus obstructed breathing. Compared with control, HRV intensely increased during obstructed breathing: R-R intervals (time between consecutive R waves) standard deviation increased from 65 to 108 msec (P < 0.0001), root mean square of successive R-R interval from 61 to 82 msec (P = 0.001), number of pairs of successive R-R intervals that differ by more than 50 msec (NN50) from 16.5 to 25.3 events (P < 0.0001), and proportion of NN50 divided by total number of R-R intervals from 26.6 to 35.1% (P = 0.001). Low frequency power increased by more than fourfold (P < 0.0001), allowing 90% sensitivity and 75% specificity for identifying airway obstruction (ROC area 0.88, P < 0.0001). We observed a rapid intense increase in HRV during obstructed breathing, significant enough to detect during a short 1-min sampling window. These findings suggest that HRV may be useful for rapid detection of airway obstruction, especially in situations where end-tidal CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.