Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30632258›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2019

Rehabilitation environments: Service users' perspective.

Maggie Killington, Dean Fyfe, Allan Patching, Paul Habib, Annabel McNamara, Rachael Kay, Venugopal Kochiyil, Maria Crotty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Why hospital design matters: A narrative review of built environments research relevant to stroke care.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Rehabilitation environments: Service users' perspective.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maggie KillingtonSouthern Adelaide Local Health Network, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4482-8470
Dean FyfeCentral Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Allan PatchingNorthern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Paul HabibSouthern Adelaide Local Health Network, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Annabel McNamaraSouthern Adelaide Local Health Network, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Rachael KayCentral Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Venugopal KochiyilNorthern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Maria CrottySouthern Adelaide Local Health Network, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.

Funding

Southern Adelaide Clinical Human Research Ethics Committee SAC HREC ECOO188Southern Local Health Network of South Australia 425.16-HREC/16/SAC/431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDesign of rehabilitation environments is usually "expert" driven with little consideration given to the perceptions of service users, especially patients and informal carers. There is a need to engage with consumers of services to gain their insights into what design aspects are required to facilitate optimum physical activity, social interaction and psychological responses when they are attempting to overcome their limitations and regain function. RESEARCH

designQualitative exploratory study.

methodInterviews were conducted with patients (n = 54) and informal carers (n = 23), and focus groups with rehabilitation staff (n = 90), from the three metropolitan South Australia rehabilitation health services, comprising different building and environmental configurations. Thematic analysis was assisted by the use of NVivo 11 qualitative software, with pooled data from all interviews and focus groups undergoing open, axial and finally selective coding.

resultsFour major themes were identified as follows: (a) choice can be an Illusion in a rehabilitation ward; (b) access to outside areas is a priority and affects well-being; (c) socialization can be facilitated by the environment; and (d) ward configuration should align with the model of care. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionParticipants who encountered the most restrictive environments accepted their situation until probed to consider alternatives; those who enjoyed the most choice and access to facilities showed the greatest enthusiasm for these affordances. Future architectural designers should therefore consider the perceptions of a wide range of consumers with varying experiences to ensure they understand the complex requirements of patients and that the ward design facilitates the optimum rehabilitation model of care.

Indexed as

Facility Design and ConstructionAdultCaregiversFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalePatientsQualitative ResearchRehabilitation CentersSoftwareSouth Australiabuildingscarerschoicescliniciansconsumersenvironmentsoutsidepatientsrehabilitationwell-being

Identifiers

PMID30632258
PMCPMC6543154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.