Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30632242›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2019

Navigating and making sense of urgent and emergency care processes and provision.

Catherine Pope, Gemma McKenna, Joanne Turnbull, Jane Prichard, Anne Rogers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Primary care transformation in Scotland: a qualitative evaluation of the views of patients.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Parent's preferences for unscheduled paediatric healthcare: A discrete choice experiment.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. The perceptions of general practice among Central and Eastern Europeans in the United Kingdom: A systematic scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Stuff you think you can handle as a parent and stuff you can't'. Understanding parental health-seeking behaviour when accessing unscheduled care: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Catherine PopeNIHR CLAHRC Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8935-6702
Gemma McKennaNIHR CLAHRC Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Joanne TurnbullHealth Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Jane PrichardHealth Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Anne RogersNIHR CLAHRC Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Funding

Department of Health HS&DR/14/19/16NIHR HS&DR programme 14/19/16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhilst many health systems offer a range of urgent and emergency care services to deal with the need for unscheduled care, these can be problematic to navigate.

objectiveTo explore how lay people make sense of urgent care provision and processes.

designQualitative study, incorporating citizen panels and longitudinal semi-structured qualitative interviews. SETTING AND

participantsTwo citizens' panels, comprising purposively selected public populations-a group of regular users and a group of potentially marginalized users of urgent and emergency care. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 100 people, purposively sampled to include those over 75, aged 18-26 years, and from East/Central Europe. A sub-sample of 41 people received a second interview at +6-12 months. Framework analysis was thematic and comparative, moving through coding to narrative and interpretive summaries. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION: Participants narratives illuminated considerable uncertainty and confusion regarding urgent and emergency care provision which in part could be traced to the contingent nature of urgent and emergency care need. Accounts of emergency care provision were underpinned by strong moral positioning of appropriate help-seeking, demarcating legitimate service use that echoed policy rhetoric, but did not necessarily translate into individual behaviour. People struggled to make sense of urgent care provision making navigating "appropriate" use problematic.

conclusionsThe focus on help-seeking behaviour, rather than sense-making, makes it difficult to move beyond the polarization of "appropriate" and "inappropriate" service use. A deeper analysis of sense-making might shift the focus of attention and allow us to intervene to reshape understandings before this point.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesProcess Assessment, Health CarePublic OpinionAdolescentAdultAgedEuropeFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative Researchcitizen panelemergency careinterviewsense-makingurgent care

Identifiers

PMID30632242
PMCPMC6543158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.