Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30632193›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2019

Extreme learning machine Cox model for high-dimensional survival analysis.

Hong Wang, Gang Li

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hong WangSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6938-9507
Gang LiDepartment of Biostatistics, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-4753-9420

Funding

Women's CancersP30CA016042 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI JOHN A GLASPY · 1985 to 2026
$134.5M
UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$57.0M
UCLA SPORE in Brain CancerP50CA211015 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI David A. Nathanson · 2017 to 2026
$25.2M
UCLA Center for Excellence in Pancreatic DiseasesP01AT003960 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GO, VAY LIANG W · 2007 to 2011
$5.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000124NCCIH NIH HHS P01 AT003960NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016042NCI NIH HHS P50 CA211015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some interesting recent studies have shown that neural network models are useful alternatives in modeling survival data when the assumptions of a classical parametric or semiparametric survival model such as the Cox (1972) model are seriously violated. However, to the best of our knowledge, the plausibility of adapting the emerging extreme learning machine (ELM) algorithm for single-hidden-layer feedforward neural networks to survival analysis has not been explored. In this paper, we present a kernel ELM Cox model regularized by an L

Indexed as

AlgorithmsProportional Hazards ModelsComputer SimulationHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerStatistics, NonparametricSurvival Analysiscensored dataextreme learning machinemachine learningregularized Cox modelsurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID30632193
PMCPMC6498851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.