Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30632139›Full record

SynthesisDevelopmental medicine and child neurology2019

Interventions to improve upper limb function for children with bilateral cerebral palsy: a systematic review.

Véronique F P Plasschaert, Johanna E Vriezekolk, Pauline B M Aarts, Alexander C H Geurts, Cornelia H M Van den Ende

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Véronique F P PlasschaertDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2632-0761
Johanna E VriezekolkDepartment of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Pauline B M AartsDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Alexander C H GeurtsDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Cornelia H M Van den EndeDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo systematically review the efficacy of interventions on upper limb function in children 0 to 19 years of age with bilateral cerebral palsy on the basis of outcome measures of upper limb function and measures of activities and/or participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.

methodCochrane, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched from inception to September 2017. Methodological quality and strength of evidence were analysed by two independent raters using Sackett's level of evidence and the American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine (AACPDM) guidelines.

resultsFifteen studies with a large variety of interventions and heterogeneity in outcome measures met the inclusion criteria. Twelve studies provided level IV evidence according to AACPDM guidelines. For three small randomized controlled trials the level of evidence was II. Only one of these trials showed strong methodological quality: a study on hand-arm bimanual intensive therapy including lower extremities.

interpretationWe identified a large variety of interventions, heterogeneity in outcome measures, and generally weak to moderate methodological quality for most studies. We recommend further research specifically aimed at bimanual-intensive, goal-directed, and task-specific training programmes for the upper limb in children with bilateral cerebral palsy, using either high-quality (multicentre) trials or well-designed single-case trials. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: There is a large variety of interventions on upper limb function in children with bilateral cerebral palsy. Heterogeneity of outcome measures and interventions impeded firm conclusions about intervention efficacy. Most studies had low-level evidence and weak to moderate methodological quality. The strongest evidence from a small randomized controlled trial was for hand-arm bimanual intensive therapy including lower extremities.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesCerebral PalsyChildHumansTreatment OutcomeUpper Extremity

Identifiers

PMID30632139
PMCPMC6850353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.