ReviewTechniques in coloproctology2019
Pelvic floor rehabilitation for defecation disorders.
Review in Techniques in coloproctology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pelvic floor physical therapy in the treatment of chronic anal fissure (PAF trial): quality of life outcome.Techniques in coloproctology · 2023Trial
- Pelvic floor physical therapy in patients with chronic anal fissure: a randomized controlled trial.Techniques in coloproctology · 2022Trial
- Diagnostic-Therapeutic Care Pathway in Chronic Constipation: AIGO (Italian Association of Gastroenterologists and Gastrointestinal Endoscopists) Position Paper.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Bladder and Bowel Management in Adolescents and Young Adults with Multiple Sclerosis Since Childhood: Is Bowel Management Overlooked? A Case Series.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The rectum, anal sphincter and puborectalis muscle show different contraction wave forms during prolonged measurement with a simulated feces.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Influencing factors of recurrence after pelvic organ prolapse surgery and construction of a nomogram risk prediction model.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2024Article
- Editorial: Pelvic floor disorders: a multidisciplinary issue.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- Article
- Staying in HRAM's Way: Tweaking the London Classification for Disorders of Anorectal Function.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022Article
- A novel wireless, smartphone-based biofeedback training device for functional defecatory disorders: a pilot study.Techniques in coloproctology · 2022Article
- A step-by-step approach to endorectal proctopexy (ERPP): how we do it.Techniques in coloproctology · 2021Article
- Sampling reflex: pathogenic role in functional defecation disorder.Techniques in coloproctology · 2021Article
- Enhanced recovery after surgery nursing program, a protective factor for stoma-related complications in patients with low rectal cancer.BMC surgery · 2020Article
- An imaginary cuboid: chest, abdomen, vertebral column and perineum, different parts of the same whole in the harmonic functioning of the pelvic floor.Techniques in coloproctology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pelvic floor rehabilitation is frequently recommended for defecation disorders, in both constipation and fecal incontinence. However, the lack of patient selection, together with the variety of rehabilitation methods and protocols, often jeopardize the results of this approach, causing difficulty in evaluating outcomes and addressing proper management, and above all, in obtaining scientific evidence for the efficacy of these methods for specific indications. The authors represent different gastroenterological and surgical scientific societies in Italy, and their aim was to identify the indications and agree on treatment protocols for pelvic floor rehabilitation of patients with defecation disorders. This was achieved by means of a modified Delphi method, utilizing a working team (10 members) which developed the statements and a consensus group (15 members, different from the previous ones) which voted twice also suggesting modifications of the statements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30631977What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.