Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30631953›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2019

An assessment of the replicability of a standard and modified sanitary risk protocol for groundwater sources in Greater Accra.

W Yentumi, M Dzodzomenyo, K Sashie-Doe, J Wright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

W YentumiSchool of Public Health, University of Ghana, PO Box LG13, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
M DzodzomenyoSchool of Public Health, University of Ghana, PO Box LG13, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
K Sashie-DoeSchool of Public Health, University of Ghana, PO Box LG13, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
J WrightGeography and Environment, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. j.a.wright@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8842-2181

Funding

Royal Society SM150014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sanitary risk inspection, the systematic observation of contamination hazards, is often used to manage safety of water sources such as wells and boreholes. However, the replicability of sanitary risk inspections undertaken by different observers has not been studied. This study aimed to assess the replicability of sanitary risk inspections by two different observers in urban and peri-urban neighbourhoods of Greater Accra, Ghana. Two observers independently used a standard protocol to record contamination hazards around 62 groundwater sources, additionally recording urban-specific hazards such as damaged sewage pipes via a modified protocol. We calculated risk scores as the proportion of hazards observed at each source, separately for each observer. Linn's concordance correlation coefficient indicated very high agreement between the two observers' risk scores (n = 62; c = 0.949, 95% confidence limits 0.917-0.968). However, risk scores from urban-specific observations were uncorrelated with those from the standard protocol (r = 0.11, p = 0.41 for observer 1; r = 0.16, p = 0.22 for observer 2). Ours is the first study of replicability of sanitary risk observations and suggests high inter-observer agreement. However, urban contamination hazards were not captured using the standard protocol. In the future, assessment of inter-observer agreement and observations of urban-specific hazards could be incorporated into nationwide or regional sanitary risk surveys.

Indexed as

Water MicrobiologyWater WellsEnvironmental MonitoringGhanaGroundwaterHumansGhanaGroundwaterInter-observer agreementReplicabilitySanitary risk inspection

Identifiers

PMID30631953
PMCPMC6328521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.