Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30631934›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2019

A novel algorithm for better distinction of primary mucinous ovarian carcinomas and mucinous carcinomas metastatic to the ovary.

Michiel Simons, Thomas Bolhuis, Anton F De Haan, Annette H Bruggink, Johan Bulten, Leon F Massuger, Iris D Nagtegaal

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michiel SimonsDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6525, GA, The Netherlands. Michiel.Simons@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1039-3488
Thomas BolhuisDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6525, GA, The Netherlands.
Anton F De HaanDepartment for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6525, GA, The Netherlands.
Annette H BrugginkPALGA, The Nationwide Network and Registry of Histo- and Cytopathology in the Netherlands, 3995, GA, Houten, The Netherlands.
Johan BultenDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6525, GA, The Netherlands.
Leon F MassugerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6525, GA, The Netherlands.
Iris D NagtegaalDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6525, GA, The Netherlands.

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding KUN 2014-6613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary mucinous ovarian carcinomas (MOC) are notoriously difficult to distinguish from mucinous carcinomas metastatic to the ovary (mMC). Studies performed on small cohorts reported algorithms based on tumor size and laterality to aid in distinguishing MOC from mMC. We evaluated and improved these by performing a large-scale, nationwide search in the Dutch Pathology Registry. All registered pathology reports fulfilling our search criteria concerning MOC in the Netherlands from 2000 to 2011 were collected. Age, histology, laterality, and size were extracted. An existing database covering the same timeline containing tumors metastatic to the ovary was used, extracting all mMC, age, size, laterality, and primary tumor location. Existing algorithms were applied to our cohort. Subsequently, an algorithm based on tumor histology, laterality, and a nomogram based on age and size was created for differentiating MOC and mMC. We identified 735 MOC and 1018 mMC. Patients with MOC were significantly younger and MOC were significantly larger and more often unilateral than mMC. Signet ring cell carcinomas were rarely primary. Our algorithm used signet ring cell histology, bilaterality, and a nomogram integrating patient age and tumor size to diagnose mMC. Sensitivity and specificity for mMC was 90.1% and 59.0%, respectively. Applying existing algorithms on our cohort yielded a far lower sensitivity. The algorithm described here using tumor histology, laterality, size, and patient age has higher sensitivity but lower specificity compared to earlier algorithms and aids in indicating tumor origin, but for conclusive diagnosis, careful integration of morphology, immunohistochemistry, and clinical and imaging data is recommended.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDecision Support TechniquesTumor BurdenAdenocarcinoma, MucinousAdultAgedAge FactorsCarcinoma, Signet Ring CellDatabases, FactualDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNetherlandsNomogramsOvarian NeoplasmsAlgorithmColorectal carcinomaMetastasisMucinous ovarian carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID30631934
PMCPMC6515884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.