Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30631906›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2020

Temporal expression of wound healing-related genes inform wound age estimation in rats after a skeletal muscle contusion: a multivariate statistical model analysis.

Qiu-Xiang Du, Na Li, Li-Hong Dang, Ta-Na Dong, Han-Lin Lu, Fu-Xia Shi, Qian-Qian Jin, Cao Jie, Jun-Hong Sun

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. State-of-the-Art on Wound Vitality Evaluation: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Qiu-Xiang DuSchool of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, 56 South Xinjian Road, Taiyuan, 030001, Shanxi, People's Republic of China.
Na LiSchool of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, 56 South Xinjian Road, Taiyuan, 030001, Shanxi, People's Republic of China.
Li-Hong DangSchool of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, 56 South Xinjian Road, Taiyuan, 030001, Shanxi, People's Republic of China.
Ta-Na DongSchool of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, 56 South Xinjian Road, Taiyuan, 030001, Shanxi, People's Republic of China.
Han-Lin LuSchool of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, 56 South Xinjian Road, Taiyuan, 030001, Shanxi, People's Republic of China.
Fu-Xia ShiSchool of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, 56 South Xinjian Road, Taiyuan, 030001, Shanxi, People's Republic of China.
Qian-Qian JinSchool of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, 56 South Xinjian Road, Taiyuan, 030001, Shanxi, People's Republic of China.
Cao JieSchool of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, 56 South Xinjian Road, Taiyuan, 030001, Shanxi, People's Republic of China. jie.cao@sxmu.edu.cn.
Jun-Hong SunSchool of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, 56 South Xinjian Road, Taiyuan, 030001, Shanxi, People's Republic of China. junhong.sun@sxmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6970-2620

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81571852National Natural Science Foundation of China 81601646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although many time-dependent parameters involved in wound healing have been exhaustively investigated, establishing an objective and reliable means for estimating wound age remains a challenge. In this study, 78 Sprague-Dawley rats were divided randomly into a control group and contusion groups at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, and 48 h post-injury (n = 6 per group). The expression of 35 wound healing-related genes was explored in contused skeletal muscle by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Differences between the groups were assessed by partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). The results show that the samples were classified into three groups by wound age (4-12, 16-24, and 28-48 h). A Fisher discriminant analysis model of 14 selected genes was constructed, and 94.9% cross-validated grouped cases were correctly classified. A PLS regression analysis using 14 genes showed reasonable internal predictive validity, with a root mean squared error of cross-validation of approximately 8 h. To examine whether the prediction models were capable of analyzing new (ungrouped) cases, an external validation was carried out using the expression data from an additional 30 rats. Approximately 76.7% of ungrouped cases were correctly classified, which was a lower proportion than that for cross-validation. Similarly, the prediction results of the PLS model showed lower relatively external predictive validity (root mean squared error of prediction = 11 h) than internal predictive validity. Although the prediction results were less accurate than expected, the gene expression modeling and multivariate analyses showed great potential for estimating injury time. These multivariate methods may be valuable when devising future wound time estimation strategies.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionAnimalsContusionsDiscriminant AnalysisForensic PathologyLeast-Squares AnalysisMaleModels, AnimalModels, StatisticalMultivariate AnalysisMuscle, SkeletalRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, MessengerTime FactorsRNA, MessengerFDAMultivariate statistical model analysisPLSRReal-time PCRSkeletal muscle contusionWound age estimation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.