ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2020
Temporal expression of wound healing-related genes inform wound age estimation in rats after a skeletal muscle contusion: a multivariate statistical model analysis.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- State-of-the-Art on Wound Vitality Evaluation: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Pooled it
- Combined metabolomics and tandem machine-learning models for wound age estimation: a novel analytical strategy.Forensic sciences research · 2023Article
- Novel Prediction Method Applied to Wound Age Estimation: Developing a Stacking Ensemble Model to Improve Predictive Performance Based on Multi-mRNA.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Estimating the time of skeletal muscle contusion based on the spatial distribution of neutrophils: a practical approach to forensic problems.International journal of legal medicine · 2022Article
- Screening criteria of mRNA indicators for wound age estimation.Forensic sciences research · 2022Article
- Analysis of sensitivity and specificity: precise recognition of neutrophils during regeneration of contused skeletal muscle in rats.Forensic sciences research · 2022Article
- Insight into molecular profile changes after skeletal muscle contusion using microarray and bioinformatics analyses.Bioscience reports · 2021Article
- The Role of miRNAs as New Molecular Biomarkers for Dating the Age of Wound Production: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
- Article
- Investigating Transcriptional Dynamics Changes and Time-Dependent Marker Gene Expression in the Early Period After Skeletal Muscle Injury in Rats.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Novel insights into wound age estimation: combined with "up, no change, or down" system and cosine similarity in python environment.International journal of legal medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although many time-dependent parameters involved in wound healing have been exhaustively investigated, establishing an objective and reliable means for estimating wound age remains a challenge. In this study, 78 Sprague-Dawley rats were divided randomly into a control group and contusion groups at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, and 48 h post-injury (n = 6 per group). The expression of 35 wound healing-related genes was explored in contused skeletal muscle by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Differences between the groups were assessed by partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). The results show that the samples were classified into three groups by wound age (4-12, 16-24, and 28-48 h). A Fisher discriminant analysis model of 14 selected genes was constructed, and 94.9% cross-validated grouped cases were correctly classified. A PLS regression analysis using 14 genes showed reasonable internal predictive validity, with a root mean squared error of cross-validation of approximately 8 h. To examine whether the prediction models were capable of analyzing new (ungrouped) cases, an external validation was carried out using the expression data from an additional 30 rats. Approximately 76.7% of ungrouped cases were correctly classified, which was a lower proportion than that for cross-validation. Similarly, the prediction results of the PLS model showed lower relatively external predictive validity (root mean squared error of prediction = 11 h) than internal predictive validity. Although the prediction results were less accurate than expected, the gene expression modeling and multivariate analyses showed great potential for estimating injury time. These multivariate methods may be valuable when devising future wound time estimation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30631906What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.